Literature DB >> 22382604

Early magnetic resonance imaging in acute knee injury: a cost analysis.

Nirav K Patel1, Andrew Bucknill, David Ahearne, Janet Denning, Kailash Desai, Martin Watson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Acute knee injury is common, and MRI is often only used when non-operative management fails because of limited availability. We investigated whether early MRI in acute knee injury is more clinically and cost-effective compared to conventional physiotherapy and reassessment.
METHODS: All patients with acute indirect soft tissue knee injury referred to fracture clinic were approached. Recruited patients were randomised to either the MRI group: early MRI within 2 weeks or the control group: conventional management with physiotherapy. Patients were assessed in clinic initially, at 2 weeks and 3 months post-injury. Management costs were calculated for all patients until surgical treatment or discharge.
RESULTS: Forty-six patients were recruited: 23 in the MRI and 23 in the control group. Male sex and mean age were similar in the two groups. The total management cost of the MRI group was £16,127 and control group was £16,170, with a similar mean cost per patient (NS). The MRI group had less mean physiotherapy (2.5 ± 1.9 vs. 5.1 ± 3.5, p < 0.01) and outpatient appointments (NS). Median time to surgery and time off work was less in the MRI group (NS). The MRI group had less pain (p < 0.05), less activity limitation (p = 0.04) and better satisfaction (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Early MRI in acute knee injury facilitates faster diagnosis and management of internal derangement at a cost comparable to conventional treatment. Moreover, patients had significantly less time off work with improved pain, activity limitation and satisfaction scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22382604     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-1926-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  37 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging as a screening procedure to avoid arthroscopy for meniscal tears.

Authors:  J Elvenes; C P Jerome; O Reikerås; O Johansen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Double-blind assessment of the value of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate and meniscal lesions.

Authors:  J L Glashow; R Katz; M Schneider; W N Scott
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Acute knee trauma: value of a short dedicated extremity MR imaging examination for prediction of subsequent treatment.

Authors:  Edwin H G Oei; Jeroen J Nikken; Abida Z Ginai; Gabriel P Krestin; Jan A N Verhaar; Arie B van Vugt; M G Myriam Hunink
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Clinical magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic findings in knees: a comparative prospective study of meniscus anterior cruciate ligament and cartilage lesions.

Authors:  B Munk; F Madsen; E Lundorf; H Staunstrup; S A Schmidt; L Bolvig; M B Hellfritzsch; J Jensen
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  The diagnosis of meniscal tears in athletes. A comparison of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging investigations.

Authors:  T Muellner; R Weinstabl; R Schabus; V Vécsei; F Kainberger
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Influence of magnetic resonance imaging on a knee arthroscopy waiting list.

Authors:  D J Warwick; P Cavanagh; M Bell; C H Marsh
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Long-term outcome after meniscal repair.

Authors:  Mike Tengrootenhuysen; Geert Meermans; Kathleen Pittoors; Roger van Riet; Jan Victor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Timing of surgery in anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees.

Authors:  K D Shelbourne; D V Patel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  [Correlations between clinical examination/MRI/arthroscopy in the acute traumatic knee].

Authors:  J Le Vot; J C Solacroup; P Leonetti; P Nun; E Gueguen; E Le Bihan; J H Tourrette; J F Gadea; P Germanetto
Journal:  J Chir (Paris)       Date:  1994-03

10.  Diagnosis of chondral lesions of the knee joint: can MRI replace arthroscopy? A prospective study.

Authors:  B Friemert; Y Oberländer; W Schwarz; H J Häberle; W Bähren; H Gerngross; B Danz
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-08-05       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  4 in total

1.  The Value of SPECT/CT for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  D Zarringam; D B F Saris; J E J Bekkers
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-06-16       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Incidence Rates of Surgery After Knee MRI: Association According to Referring Physician Type and Patient's Age and Sex.

Authors:  Syed R Naqvi; R Cole Beavis; Prosanta Mondal; Rhonda Bryce; David A Leswick
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-11-11

3.  Efficacy of MRI in primary care for patients with knee complaints due to trauma: protocol of a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial (TACKLE trial).

Authors:  Nynke M Swart; Kim K van Oudenaarde; Paul R Algra; Partick J E Bindels; Wilbert B van den Hout; Bart W Koes; Rob G H H Nelissen; Jan A N Verhaar; Hans J L Bloem; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Monique M Reijnierse; Pim A J Luijsterburg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Workers' Societal Costs After Knee and Shoulder Injuries and Diagnosis with In-Office Arthroscopy or Delayed MRI: A Cost-Minimization Analysis.

Authors:  Joseph Liu; Jack Farr; Omar Ramos; Jeff Voigt; Nirav Amin
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-06-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.