Literature DB >> 12296681

Bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis involving a unilateral approach with microscope and tubular retractor system.

Sylvain Palmer1, Robert Turner, Rosemary Palmer.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The authors studied a consecutive series of patients with spinal stenosis in whom surgery was performed by a single surgeon who used a microscopic tubular retractor system (METRx-MD); patients underwent prospective evaluation involving radiography and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The objective was to assess the feasibility and surgery-related efficacy of performing unilateral-approach bilateral decompression and utilization of METRx-MD instrumentation in patients with spinal stenosis.
METHODS: Seventeen consecutive patients with spinal stenosis underwent bilateral decompression; surgery was performed via a unilateral approach using METRx-MD instrumentation. The procedures were performed on an outpatient basis after induction of general anesthesia. Preoperative and 3-month follow-up plain radiographs with flexion-extension views were obtained. Preoperative and postoperative MR imaging was also performed. All studies were assessed by a single radiologist blinded to the clinical results. Twenty-two levels were surgically decompressed. The mean operative time was 90 minutes and the mean blood loss was 28 ml per level. Preoperatively stenosis was severe at 13 levels, moderate/severe at eight, and moderate at one. Postoperatively stenosis was absent at 13 levels, mild at seven, mild/moderate at one, and moderate at one. Preoperatively degenerative spondylolisthesis was documented in eight patients, with flexion-extension radiography revealing motion in three cases. On early (3-month) postoperative x-ray films there was no evidence of progression in any case. Grade I spondylolisthesis developed postoperatively in one patient, who remained asymptomatic.
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive bilateral decompression and instrumentation-assisted fusion can be successfully performed via a unilateral approach in patients with acquired spinal stenosis; the procedure can be undertaken on an outpatient basis, with reasonable operative times, minimal blood loss, and acceptable morbidity rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12296681     DOI: 10.3171/spi.2002.97.2.0213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  39 in total

Review 1.  Paradigm changes in spine surgery: evolution of minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  Zachary A Smith; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  [SENDS criteria from the diversification of MAST procedures. Implementation of preoperative simulation].

Authors:  B Rieger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  Halit Cavuşoğlu; Ramazan Alper Kaya; Osman Nuri Türkmenoglu; Cengiz Tuncer; Ibrahim Colak; Yunus Aydin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Unilateral tubular approach for bilateral laminotomy: effect on ipsilateral and contralateral buttock and leg pain.

Authors:  Marjan Alimi; Christoph P Hofstetter; Jose M Torres-Campa; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Guang-Ting Cong; Innocent Njoku; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Minimally invasive procedures on the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Branko Skovrlj; Jeffrey Gilligan; Holt S Cutler; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.337

6.  Percutaneous full endoscopic posterior decompression of thoracic myelopathy caused by ossification of the ligamentum flavum.

Authors:  Bo An; Xing-Chen Li; Cheng-Pei Zhou; Bi-Sheng Wang; Hao-Ran Gao; Hai-Jun Ma; Yi He; Hong-Gang Zhou; He-Jun Yang; Ji-Xian Qian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jwo-Luen Pao; Wein-Chin Chen; Po-Quang Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Akihito Minamide; Munehito Yoshida; Hiroshi Yamada; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Kazuhiro Maio; Masaki Kawai; Hiroshi Iwasaki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Spinal canal morphology and clinical outcomes of microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  Won-Seok Choi; Chang Hyun Oh; Gyu Yeul Ji; Sung Chan Shin; Jang-Bo Lee; Dong-Hyuk Park; Tai-Hyoung Cho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Health-related quality of life following decompression compared to decompression and fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a Canadian multicentre study.

Authors:  Y Raja Rampersaud; Charles Fisher; Albert Yee; Marcel F Dvorak; Joel Finkelstein; Eugene Wai; Edward Abraham; Stephen J Lewis; David Alexander; William Oxner
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.