Literature DB >> 8499817

Coronary artery surgery: are women discriminated against?

M Petticrew1, M McKee, J Jones.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the sex differences in access to cardiac surgery observed in the United States exist in the United Kingdom.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of routinely collected data.
SETTING: South West Thames and North West Thames regional health authorities.
SUBJECTS: 8564 patients discharged from hospital with a principal diagnosis of coronary heart disease in 1987-8 in South West Thames region and 15243 discharges in North West Thames region in 1990-1. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Performance of angiography or coronary artery bypass surgery.
RESULTS: In all age groups and among patients with a principal diagnosis of either angina or chronic ischaemia men were significantly more likely than women to undergo revascularisation in both regions. Using multiple logistic regression to control for potential clinical and demographic confounders, the male to female odds ratio for revascularisation among all cases was 1.59 (95% confidence interval 1.25 to 2.03) in South West Thames region and 1.47 (1.32 to 1.63) in North West Thames region.
CONCLUSION: There appears to be a systematic difference in the treatment received by men and women in the United Kingdom. The reasons for this are uncertain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8499817      PMCID: PMC1677672          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.306.6886.1164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  25 in total

1.  Cardiac rehabilitation programmes: are women less likely to attend?

Authors:  H M McGee; J H Horgan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-08-01

2.  The Yentl syndrome.

Authors:  B Healy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Is there sex bias in the management of coronary artery disease?

Authors:  D A Foster; M K Gillette; D N McNeill; A M Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Is there sex bias in the management of coronary artery disease?

Authors:  R M Poses; W R Smith; B P Schmitt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Is there sex bias in the management of coronary artery disease?

Authors:  D G Kassebaum
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  J Z Ayanian; A M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Investigators.

Authors:  R M Steingart; M Packer; P Hamm; M E Coglianese; B Gersh; E M Geltman; J Sollano; S Katz; L Moyé; L L Basta
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Myocardial revascularization in women.

Authors:  D H Tyras; H B Barner; G C Kaiser; J E Codd; H Laks; V L Willman
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Surgical treatment of coronary artery disease: pure graft operations, with a study of 741 patients followed 3--7 yr.

Authors:  W C Sheldon; G Rincon; A D Pichard; M Razavi; C Cheanvechai; F D Loop
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1975 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.194

10.  Clinical and angiographic predictors of operative mortality from the collaborative study in coronary artery surgery (CASS).

Authors:  J W Kennedy; G C Kaiser; L D Fisher; J K Fritz; W Myers; J G Mudd; T J Ryan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  37 in total

1.  Racial and geographic disparities in timing of bidirectional Glenn and Fontan stages of single-ventricle palliation.

Authors:  Angelo S Milazzo; Stephen P Sanders; Brenda E Armstrong; Jennifer S Li
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Informing the market: the strengths and weaknesses of information in the British National Health Service.

Authors:  M McKee; L Chenet
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1997-06

3.  An epidemiological needs assessment of carotid endarterectomy in an English health region. Is the need being met?

Authors:  G Ferris; P Roderick; A Smithies; S George; J Gabbay; N Couper; A Chant
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-15

4.  Sex and coronary heart disease: the relative probability of dying in hospital.

Authors:  C J Currie; J R Peters
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Sex differences in investigation results and treatment in subjects referred for investigation of chest pain.

Authors:  Y Wong; A Rodwell; S Dawkins; S A Livesey; I A Simpson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Gender differences in the management and outcome of patients with acute coronary artery disease.

Authors:  R A Raine; N A Black; T J Bowker; D A Wood
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Are the economically active more deserving?

Authors:  B Gaffney; F Kee
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-04

8.  Women and coronary artery surgery. Fewer women referred for investigation.

Authors:  D De Bono
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-06-19

9.  Expanding access to coronary artery bypass surgery: who stands to gain?

Authors:  F Kee; B Gaffney; C Canavan; J Little; W McConnell; A M Telford; J D Watson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-02

10.  Social inequalities in mortality by cause among men and women in France.

Authors:  M-J Saurel-Cubizolles; J-F Chastang; G Menvielle; A Leclerc; D Luce
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.