Literature DB >> 12237385

The Frequency and Degree of Cosuppression by Sense Chalcone Synthase Transgenes Are Dependent on Transgene Promoter Strength and Are Reduced by Premature Nonsense Codons in the Transgene Coding Sequence.

Q. Que1, H. Y. Wang, J. J. English, R. A. Jorgensen.   

Abstract

By comparing the effects of strong and weak promoters that drive sense chalcone synthase (Chs) transgenes in large populations of independently transformed plants, we show here that a strong transgene promoter is required for high-frequency cosuppression of Chs genes and for production of the full range of cosuppression phenotypes. In addition, sense Chs transgenes driven by a cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter possessing a single copy of the upstream activator region (UAR) were found to produce a significantly lower degree of cosuppression than they did when the transgene promoter possessed two or four copies of the UAR. It has been shown elsewhere that 35S promoter strength increases with increasing UAR copy number. Frameshift mutations producing early nonsense codons in the Chs transgene were found to reduce the frequency and the degree of cosuppression. These results suggest that promoter strength and transcript stability determine the degree of cosuppression, supporting the hypothesis that sense cosuppression is a response to the accumulation of transcripts at high concentrations. This conclusion was shown to apply to single-copy transgenes but not necessarily to inversely repeated transgenes. The results presented here also have significance for efficient engineering of cosuppression phenotypes for use in research and agriculture.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 12237385      PMCID: PMC157003          DOI: 10.1105/tpc.9.8.1357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell        ISSN: 1040-4651            Impact factor:   11.277


  22 in total

1.  Suppression of Virus Accumulation in Transgenic Plants Exhibiting Silencing of Nuclear Genes.

Authors:  J. J. English; E. Mueller; D. C. Baulcombe
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  How and Why Do Plants Inactivate Homologous (Trans)genes?

Authors:  M. A. Matzke; AJM. Matzke
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Inhibition of gene expression by a short sense fragment.

Authors:  F H Cameron; P A Jennings
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-02-11       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Expression of a truncated tomato polygalacturonase gene inhibits expression of the endogenous gene in transgenic plants.

Authors:  C J Smith; C F Watson; C R Bird; J Ray; W Schuch; D Grierson
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1990-12

5.  Cosuppression, flower color patterns, and metastable gene expression States.

Authors:  R A Jorgensen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Flavonoid genes in petunia: addition of a limited number of gene copies may lead to a suppression of gene expression.

Authors:  A R van der Krol; L A Mur; M Beld; J N Mol; A R Stuitje
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 7.  Somatic mutations in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: a blessing in disguise?

Authors:  L Luzzatto; M Bessler; B Rotoli
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-01-10       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Multiple cis regulatory elements for maximal expression of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter in transgenic plants.

Authors:  R X Fang; F Nagy; S Sivasubramaniam; N H Chua
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 9.  Transgenes and gene suppression: telling us something new?

Authors:  W G Dougherty; T D Parks
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 8.382

10.  Recombination of constant and variable modules alters DNA sequence recognition by type IC restriction-modification enzymes.

Authors:  M Gubler; D Braguglia; J Meyer; A Piekarowicz; T A Bickle
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  60 in total

1.  white anther: A petunia mutant that abolishes pollen flavonol accumulation, induces male sterility, and is complemented by a chalcone synthase transgene

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  High-efficiency silencing of a beta-glucuronidase gene in rice is correlated with repetitive transgene structure but is independent of DNA methylation.

Authors:  M B Wang; P M Waterhouse
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 3.  RNA degradation and models for post-transcriptional gene-silencing.

Authors:  F Meins
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 4.  RNA-directed DNA methylation.

Authors:  M Wassenegger
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 5.  Plants as bioreactors for protein production: avoiding the problem of transgene silencing.

Authors:  C De Wilde; H Van Houdt; S De Buck; G Angenon; G De Jaeger; A Depicker
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 6.  Role of inverted DNA repeats in transcriptional and post-transcriptional gene silencing.

Authors:  M W Muskens; A P Vissers; J N Mol; J M Kooter
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 7.  Use of matrix attachment regions (MARs) to minimize transgene silencing.

Authors:  G C Allen; S Spiker; W F Thompson
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

8.  Coincident sequence-specific RNA degradation of linked transgenes in the plant genome.

Authors:  Megumi Kasai; Maiko Koseki; Kazunori Goto; Chikara Masuta; Shiho Ishii; Roger P Hellens; Akito Taneda; Akira Kanazawa
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 9.  Gene silencing-based disease resistance.

Authors:  Michael Wassenegger
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.788

10.  Translation start sequences affect the efficiency of silencing of Agrobacterium tumefaciens T-DNA oncogenes.

Authors:  Hyewon Lee; Jodi L Humann; Jennifer S Pitrak; Josh T Cuperus; T Dawn Parks; Cheryl A Whistler; Machteld C Mok; L Walt Ream
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.