Literature DB >> 12509140

Gene silencing-based disease resistance.

Michael Wassenegger1.   

Abstract

The definition of a disease is fundamentally difficult, even if one considers only genetically based diseases. In its broadest sense, disease can be defined as any deviation from the norm that results in a physiological disadvantage. Natural selection ensures that the norm for any given species is constantly changing. In addition, some disadvantages are latent and might only manifest under certain environmental conditions. Conversely, an apparent disadvantage can carry a benefit, for example, the disease sickle-cell anemia that is an advantage in malarial areas. Because of the difficulties in giving disease a precise definition, in this review, gene silencing-based disease resistance will be restricted to the description of gene inactivation processes that contribute to maintain the physical fitness of an organism. In this sense, we are concerned with the elimination of invasive nucleic acid expressing. In numerous organisms, a variety of severe diseases are caused by the attack of invasive nucleic acids such as viruses and retroviral or transposable elements. Organisms have developed diverse mechanisms to defend themselves against such attack that include immune responses and apoptosis. Fungi, plants, invertebrates and vertebrates also enlist gene silencing systems to counteract the harmful effects of invasive nucleic acids. In particular, plants that lack interferon and immune responses have established efficient transcriptional and post-transcriptional gene silencing systems. In this review, we describe how plants defend against invasive nucleic acids and focus on the continual evolutionary battle between plants and viruses. In addition, the importance of controlling transposon activity is outlined. Finally, gene silencing-related mechanisms of genomic imprinting and X-chromosome inactivation are discussed in the context of disease resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12509140     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021130127700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  119 in total

1.  Cosuppression of nonhomologous transgenes in Drosophila involves mutually related endogenous sequences.

Authors:  M Pal-Bhadra; U Bhadra; J A Birchler
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  The epigenetic basis of gender in flowering plants and mammals.

Authors:  M Spielman; R Vinkenoog; H G Dickinson; R J Scott
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  RNA: guiding gene silencing.

Authors:  M Matzke; A J Matzke; J M Kooter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Transcriptional silencing and promoter methylation triggered by double-stranded RNA.

Authors:  M F Mette; W Aufsatz; J van der Winden; M A Matzke; A J Matzke
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-10-02       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  The Frequency and Degree of Cosuppression by Sense Chalcone Synthase Transgenes Are Dependent on Transgene Promoter Strength and Are Reduced by Premature Nonsense Codons in the Transgene Coding Sequence.

Authors:  Q. Que; H. Y. Wang; J. J. English; R. A. Jorgensen
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  HOMOLOGY-DEPENDENT GENE SILENCING IN PLANTS.

Authors:  P. Meyer; H. Saedler
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1996-06

7.  Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  A Fire; S Xu; M K Montgomery; S A Kostas; S E Driver; C C Mello
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Non-CpG methylation is prevalent in embryonic stem cells and may be mediated by DNA methyltransferase 3a.

Authors:  B H Ramsahoye; D Biniszkiewicz; F Lyko; V Clark; A P Bird; R Jaenisch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Identification of Arabidopsis histone deacetylase HDA6 mutants that affect transgene expression.

Authors:  J Murfett; X J Wang; G Hagen; T J Guilfoyle
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 10.  Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites.

Authors:  J A Yoder; C P Walsh; T H Bestor
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.639

View more
  6 in total

1.  Engineering broad-spectrum resistance against RNA viruses in potato.

Authors:  M Arif; U Azhar; M Arshad; Y Zafar; S Mansoor; S Asad
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Protection of transgenic tobacco plants expressing bovine pancreatic ribonuclease against tobacco mosaic virus.

Authors:  Ekaterina A Trifonova; Mikhail V Sapotsky; Marina L Komarova; Andrey B Scherban; Vladimir K Shumny; Albina M Polyakova; Larisa A Lapshina; Alex V Kochetov; Vladimir I Malinovsky
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 4.570

3.  Matrix attachment regions increase the efficiency and stability of RNA-mediated resistance to tomato spotted wilt virus in transgenic tobacco.

Authors:  Jennifer S Levin; William F Thompson; Alex S Csinos; Michael G Stephenson; Arthur K Weissinger
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Tissue-specific gene silencing mediated by a naturally occurring chalcone synthase gene cluster in Glycine max.

Authors:  Jigyasa H Tuteja; Steven J Clough; Wan-Ching Chan; Lila O Vodkin
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Horizontal transfer of a plant transposon.

Authors:  Xianmin Diao; Michael Freeling; Damon Lisch
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Progressive 35S promoter methylation increases rapidly during vegetative development in transgenic Nicotiana attenuata plants.

Authors:  Arne Weinhold; Mario Kallenbach; Ian Thomas Baldwin
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 4.215

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.