Literature DB >> 12228949

Helping clinicians in work disability prevention: the work disability diagnosis interview.

Marie-José Durand1, Patrick Loisel, Quan Nha Hong, Nicole Charpentier.   

Abstract

Recent evidence has demonstrated that disability from musculoskeletal disorders is a multifactorial problem that is not only due to workers' characteristics but also closely related to environmental factors, such as the workplace, the health care system, the compensation system, and the interactions among all stakeholders regarding the disability problem. The Work Disability Diagnosis Interview (WoDDI) was developed following a systematic method in order to help clinicians detect possible disability prognostic factors in subacute or chronic musculoskeletal pain patients. A structured literature review, followed by expert input and a second round of revisions after 4-year's usage led to the current version. The WoDDI is composed of open-ended questions on physical, psychosocial, occupational, and administrative factors, collated into an interview form used at the first encounter with the disabled worker. It enables clinicians to develop a rehabilitation plan and focus on disability resolution in patients absent from work due to a musculoskeletal disorder. Initial application demonstrated a high prevalence of sociodemographic, work-related, and psychosocial factors that may contribute to prolonged work absence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12228949     DOI: 10.1023/a:1016846712499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  58 in total

Review 1.  Assessing global pain severity by self-report in clinical and health services research.

Authors:  M Von Korff; M P Jensen; P Karoly
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Therapeutic Return to Work: Rehabilitation in the workplace.

Authors:  Marie-José Durand; Patrick Loisel
Journal:  Work       Date:  2001

3.  The subjective experience of acute pain. An assessment of the utility of 10 indices.

Authors:  M P Jensen; P Karoly; E F O'Riordan; F Bland; R S Burns
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain.

Authors:  S J Linton; K Halldén
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.442

5.  Prognostic factors for return to work after a first compensated episode of back pain.

Authors:  C Infante-Rivard; M Lortie
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance.

Authors:  Johan W S Vlaeyen; Ank M J Kole-Snijders; Ruben G B Boeren; H van Eek
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  The dominant role of psychosocial risk factors in the development of chronic low back pain disability.

Authors:  R J Gatchel; P B Polatin; T G Mayer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Prognostic indicators for acute low-back pain.

Authors:  M N Goertz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope--if we can just get all the players onside.

Authors:  J Frank; S Sinclair; S Hogg-Johnson; H Shannon; C Bombardier; D Beaton; D Cole
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-06-16       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Low back pain: predictors of absenteeism, residual symptoms, functional impairment, and medical costs in Oregon workers' compensation recipients.

Authors:  P G Butterfield; P S Spencer; N Redmond; A Feldstein; N Perrin
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.214

View more
  20 in total

1.  Prediction of return to work outcomes under an injured worker case management program.

Authors:  Wenming Kong; Dan Tang; Xiaoyuan Luo; Ignatius Tak Sun Yu; Youxin Liang; Yonghua He
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-06

2.  Validation of the Work Disability Diagnosis Interview for Musculoskeletal and Mental Disorders.

Authors:  Marie-José Durand; Marie-France Coutu; Djamal Berbiche
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-03

3.  Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence.

Authors:  Patrick Loisel; Rachelle Buchbinder; Rowland Hazard; Robert Keller; Inger Scheel; Maurits van Tulder; Barbara Webster
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

4.  Interorganizational collaboration in occupational rehabilitation: perceptions of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation team.

Authors:  Patrick Loisel; Marie-José Durand; Raymond Baril; Julie Gervais; Marlène Falardeau
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

5.  A developmental conceptualization of return to work.

Authors:  Amanda E Young; Richard T Roessler; Radoslaw Wasiak; Kathryn M McPherson; Mireille N M van Poppel; J R Anema
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

Review 6.  Work-related outcome assessment instruments.

Authors:  Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Margin of manoeuvre indicators in the workplace during the rehabilitation process: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  M J Durand; N Vézina; R Baril; P Loisel; M C Richard; S Ngomo
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-03-31

8.  A cluster randomized clinical trial comparing functional capacity evaluation and functional interviewing as components of occupational rehabilitation programs.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Alexander K Asante; Maxi Miciak; Michele C Battié; Linda J Carroll; Ambrose Sun; Marti Mikalsky; Rene Huellstrung; Riikka Niemeläinen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-12

Review 9.  How well do return-to-work interventions for musculoskeletal conditions address the multicausality of work disability?

Authors:  Catherine Briand; Marie-José Durand; Louise St-Arnaud; Marc Corbière
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-04-08

10.  Development of the Return-to-Work Obstacles and Self-Efficacy Scale (ROSES) and Validation with Workers Suffering from a Common Mental Disorder or Musculoskeletal Disorder.

Authors:  Marc Corbière; Alessia Negrini; Marie-José Durand; Louise St-Arnaud; Catherine Briand; Jean-Baptiste Fassier; Patrick Loisel; Jean-Philippe Lachance
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.