Literature DB >> 18392925

How well do return-to-work interventions for musculoskeletal conditions address the multicausality of work disability?

Catherine Briand1, Marie-José Durand, Louise St-Arnaud, Marc Corbière.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The best-documented return-to-work rehabilitation programs concern workers with musculoskeletal disorders (MSKD). For this clientele, a global perspective has been adopted which explains the multicausality of work disability. This perspective of work disability proposes that return-to-work interventions should address three central elements: individual psychological factors, work environmental factors and factors related to the involvement of the various stakeholders. Long-term work disability is no longer seen simply as the consequence of impairment, but rather as the result of interactions between the worker and main systems: the health care, work environment and financial compensation systems.
METHODS: This paper presents a descriptive content analysis of return-to-work interventions delivered to workers with MSKD which consider this global perspective and which are found to be effective in systematic reviews of the literature.
RESULTS: The review of programs designed for workers with MSKD showed that eleven programs address the individual clinical and psychological factors, work environmental factors and factors related to the involvement of the various stakeholders, but in different ways. Only two programs met the essential components identified by the literature. These essential components are: centralized coordination of the worker's return to work, formal individual psychological and occupational interventions, workplace-based interventions, work accommodations, contact between the various stakeholders and interventions to foster concerted action.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions which involve the work environment and concerted action by the various partners seem to require the most investment in terms of energy. The establishment of common principles and shared values regarding work rehabilitation as well as less divided mechanisms for action among the various partners should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18392925     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-008-9128-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  25 in total

1.  Supervisory behaviour as a predictor of return to work in employees absent from work due to mental health problems.

Authors:  K Nieuwenhuijsen; J H A M Verbeek; A G E M de Boer; R W B Blonk; F J H van Dijk
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Effectiveness of a return-to-work intervention for subacute low-back pain.

Authors:  Hynek Hlobil; J Bart Staal; Maaike Spoelstra; Geertje A M Ariëns; Tjabe Smid; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.024

3.  Work and mental health: learning from return-to-work rehabilitation programs designed for workers with musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Catherine Briand; Marie-José Durand; Louise St-Arnaud; Marc Corbière
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2007-07-27

4.  Multidisciplinary rehabilitation of chronic work-related upper extremity disorders. Long-term effects.

Authors:  M Feuerstein; S Callan-Harris; P Hickey; D Dyer; W Armbruster; A M Carosella
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1993-04

5.  Multimodal cognitive behavioral treatment of patients sicklisted for musculoskeletal pain: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  E M Haldorsen; K Kronholm; J S Skouen; H Ursin
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Relative cost-effectiveness of extensive and light multidisciplinary treatment programs versus treatment as usual for patients with chronic low back pain on long-term sick leave: randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Jan S Skouen; Astrid L Grasdal; Ellen M H Haldorsen; Holger Ursin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Helping clinicians in work disability prevention: the work disability diagnosis interview.

Authors:  Marie-José Durand; Patrick Loisel; Quan Nha Hong; Nicole Charpentier
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-09

8.  Return to work/work retention outcomes of a functional restoration program. A multi-center, prospective study with a comparison group.

Authors:  S A Burke; C K Harms-Constas; P S Aden
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The effect of graded activity on patients with subacute low back pain: a randomized prospective clinical study with an operant-conditioning behavioral approach.

Authors:  I Lindström; C Ohlund; C Eek; L Wallin; L E Peterson; W E Fordyce; A L Nachemson
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1992-04

10.  Multidisciplinary intensive treatment for chronic low back pain: a randomized, prospective study.

Authors:  A F Bendix; T Bendix; K Vaegter; C Lund; L Frølund; L Holm
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.321

View more
  17 in total

1.  Occupational rehabilitation in Hong Kong: current status and future needs.

Authors:  H K H Kwok; G P Y Szeto; A S K Cheng; H Siu; C C H Chan
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-03

2.  A conceptual definition of vocational rehabilitation based on the ICF: building a shared global model.

Authors:  Reuben Escorpizo; Michiel F Reneman; Jan Ekholm; Julie Fritz; Terry Krupa; Sven-Uno Marnetoft; Claude E Maroun; Julietta Rodriguez Guzman; Yoshiko Suzuki; Gerold Stucki; Chetwyn C H Chan
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-06

3.  Cost-effectiveness of a participatory return-to-work intervention for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders: design of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sylvia J Vermeulen; Johannes R Anema; Antonius J M Schellart; Willem van Mechelen; Allard J van der Beek
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Quality of physiotherapy services for injured workers compensated by workers' compensation in Quebec: a focus group study of physiotherapy professionals.

Authors:  Anne Hudon; Maude Laliberté; Matthew Hunt; Debbie Ehrmann Feldman
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2015-02

5.  Interrelationship Between Organizational and Relational Aspects and the Return-to-Work Process: A Case Study with Nursing Professionals at a Teaching Hospital in Brazil.

Authors:  S Lancman; J O Barros; M D Silva; A R Pereira; T A Jardim
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-03

Review 6.  Work Participation Among Employees with Common Mental Disorders: A Meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Cecilie Nørby Thisted; Claus Vinther Nielsen; Merete Bjerrum
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-09

7.  Consequences of musculoskeletal disorders on occupational events: a life-long perspective from a national survey.

Authors:  Annette Leclerc; Pauline Pascal; Jean-François Chastang; Alexis Descatha
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

8.  Coordinated and tailored work rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation undertaken with workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Ute Bültmann; David Sherson; Jens Olsen; Carl Lysbeck Hansen; Thomas Lund; Jørgen Kilsgaard
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-01-24

9.  Return-to-work of sick-listed workers without an employment contract--what works?

Authors:  Sylvia J Vermeulen; Sietske J Tamminga; Antonius Jm Schellart; Jan Fekke Ybema; Johannes R Anema
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Aligning stakeholders' understandings of the return-to-work process: a qualitative study on workplace meetings in inpatient multimodal occupational rehabilitation.

Authors:  Nina Elisabeth Klevanger; Marius Steiro Fimland; Marit By Rise
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2021-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.