Literature DB >> 12225477

Subcutaneous chest ports via the internal jugular vein. A retrospective study of 117 oncology patients.

D Yip1, B Funaki.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review image-guided chest port insertion using the right internal jugular vein as the access site of choice.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and eighteen subcutaneous chest ports were placed via the internal jugular vein in 117 patients with malignancies using both fluoroscopic and US guidance in interventional radiology suites.
RESULTS: The technical success rate was 100% with no procedural complications. Follow-up was obtained in all patients with total access days of 40,450 days (mean, 342.8 days). Premature catheter removal was required in 8 patients (6.8%, 0.20 per 1,000 access days) due to non-treatable complications: 2 catheter occlusions/malfunctions (1.7%, 0.05 per 1,000 access days), 1 catheter-related skin erosion (0.85%, 0.024 per 1,000 access days), and 5 infections (4.2%, 0.15 per 1,000 access days). Two symptomatic right upper extremity venous thromboses also occurred (1.7%, 0.05 per 1,000 access days) that were treated successfully with anticoagulation.
CONCLUSION: Image-guided placement of internal jugular vein chest ports has a high success rate and low complication rate compared with reported series of unguided subclavian vein port insertion. The internal jugular vein should be used as the preferred venous access site compared to the subclavian vein.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12225477     DOI: 10.1080/j.1600-0455.2002.430405.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.701


  22 in total

1.  Outcome analysis in 3,160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems.

Authors:  Ulf K M Teichgräber; Stephan Kausche; Sebastian N Nagel; Bernhard Gebauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Retrospective outcome analysis of rates and types of complications after 8654 minimally invasive radiological port implantations via the subclavian vein without ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  Karolin J Paprottka; Jana Voelklein; Tobias Waggershauser; Maximilian F Reiser; Philipp M Paprottka
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  A comparison of outcomes and complications of totally implantable access port through the internal jugular vein versus the subclavian vein.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Nagasawa; Tomoharu Shimizu; Hiromichi Sonoda; Eiji Mekata; Masato Wakabayashi; Hiroyuki Ohta; Satoshi Murata; Tsuyoshi Mori; Shigeyuki Naka; Tohru Tani
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

4.  Totally Implantable Central Venous Port Catheters: Radiation Exposure as a Function of Puncture Site and Operator Experience.

Authors:  Martin Jonczyk; Bernhard Gebauer; Roman Rotzinger; Dirk Schnapauff; Bernd Hamm; Federico Collettini
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Current situation regarding central venous port implantation procedures and complications: a questionnaire-based survey of 11,693 implantations in Japan.

Authors:  Masatoshi Shiono; Shin Takahashi; Masanobu Takahashi; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Chikashi Ishioka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Central venous port systems as an integral part of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ulf K Teichgräber; Robert Pfitzmann; Herbert A F Hofmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  The central vein access port and catheter in outpatient chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a retrospective study of 101 patients.

Authors:  Hiroshi Sawayama; Naoko Hayashi; Masayuki Watanabe; Hiroshi Takamori; Toru Beppu; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Late complications associated with totally implantable venous access port implantation via the internal jugular vein.

Authors:  Shigeaki Tsuruta; Yasutomo Goto; Hideo Miyake; Hidemasa Nagai; Yuichiro Yoshioka; Norihiro Yuasa; Junichi Takamizawa
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Subcutaneous infusion ports via the internal jugular vein: single center experience.

Authors:  Bulent Karaman; Cagatay Andic; Nisa Cem Oren; Bilal Battal; Bahri Ustunsoz
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2010-08

10.  Is catheter rupture rare after totally implantable access port implantation via the right internal jugular vein? Report of a case.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Nagasawa; Tomoharu Shimizu; Hiromichi Sonoda; Hirotomi Chou; Eiji Mekata; Tohru Tani
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.