Literature DB >> 12219890

Factors modulating the effect of divided attention during retrieval of words.

Myra A Fernandes1, Morris Moscovitch.   

Abstract

In this study, we examined variables modulating interference effects on episodic memory under divided attention conditions during retrieval for a list of unrelated words. In Experiment 1, we found that distracting tasks that required animacy or syllable decisions to visually presented words, without a memory load, produced large interference on free recall performance. In Experiment 2, a distracting task requiring phonemic decisions about nonsense words produced a far larger interference effect than one that required semantic decisions about pictures. In Experiment 3, we replicated the effect of the nonsense-word distracting task on memory and showed that an equally resource-demanding picture-based task produced significant interference with memory retrieval, although the effect was smaller in magnitude. Taken together, the results suggest that free recall is disrupted by competition for phonological or word-form representations during retrieval and, to a lesser extent, by competition for semantic representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12219890     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  13 in total

1.  Divided attention and memory: evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding.

Authors:  M A Fernandes; M Moscovitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-06

2.  Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: assessment of attentional costs and a componential analysis.

Authors:  M Naveh-Benjamin; J Guez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Interference and forgetting.

Authors:  B J UNDERWOOD
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1957-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Effects of aging on source monitoring: differences in susceptibility to false fame.

Authors:  J Dywan; L Jacoby
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1990-09

5.  The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs.

Authors:  N D Anderson; F I Craik; M Naveh-Benjamin
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1998-09

6.  The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.

Authors:  F I Craik; R Govoni; M Naveh-Benjamin; N D Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-06

7.  Divided attention: a vehicle for monitoring memory processes.

Authors:  W A Johnston; S N Greenberg; R P Fisher; D W Martin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-01

8.  Comparison of older people and patients with frontal lesions: evidence from world list learning.

Authors:  D T Stuss; F I Craik; L Sayer; D Franchi; M P Alexander
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1996-09

9.  Frontal lobes and the temporal organization of memory.

Authors:  B Milner; M Petrides; M L Smith
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1985

10.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03
View more
  13 in total

1.  The effects of divided attention at study and test on false recognition: a comparison of DRM and categorized lists.

Authors:  Lauren M Knott; Stephen A Dewhurst
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

2.  Episodic memory for spatial context biases spatial attention.

Authors:  Elisa Ciaramelli; Olivia Lin; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Collaborative memory and part-set cueing impairments: the role of executive depletion in modulating retrieval disruption.

Authors:  Sarah J Barber; Suparna Rajaram
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2011-05

4.  Concurrent task effects on memory encoding and retrieval: further support for an asymmetry.

Authors:  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin; Angela Kilb; Tyler Fisher
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01

5.  Exploring the role of attention during memory retrieval: effects of semantic encoding and divided attention.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Lozito; Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

6.  Attention during memory retrieval enhances future remembering.

Authors:  Nicole M Dudukovic; Sarah Dubrow; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10

7.  Divided attention at retrieval does not influence neural correlates of recollection in young or older adults.

Authors:  Mingzhu Hou; Erin D Horne; Marianne de Chastelaine; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Recollection-Based Retrieval Is Influenced by Contextual Variation at Encoding but Not at Retrieval.

Authors:  Eyal Rosenstreich; Yonatan Goshen-Gottstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Divided attention improves delayed, but not immediate retrieval of a consolidated memory.

Authors:  Yoav Kessler; Susan Vandermorris; Nigel Gopie; Alexander Daros; Gordon Winocur; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The asymmetrical effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: a different view based on an interference with the episodic register.

Authors:  Jonathan Guez; Moshe Naveh-Benjamin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.