Literature DB >> 19744935

Attention during memory retrieval enhances future remembering.

Nicole M Dudukovic1, Sarah Dubrow, Anthony D Wagner.   

Abstract

Memory retrieval is a powerful learning event that influences whether an experience will be remembered in the future. Although retrieval can succeed in the presence of distraction, dividing attention during retrieval may reduce the power of remembering as an encoding event. In the present experiments, participants studied pictures of objects under full attention and then engaged in item recognition and source memory retrieval under full or divided attention. Two days later, a second recognition and source recollection test assessed the impact of attention during initial retrieval on long-term retention. On this latter test, performance was superior for items that had been tested initially under full versus divided attention. More importantly, even when items were correctly recognized on the first test, divided attention reduced the likelihood of subsequent recognition on the second test. The same held true for source recollection. Additionally, foils presented during the first test were also less likely to be later recognized if they had been encountered initially under divided attention. These findings demonstrate that attentive retrieval is critical for learning through remembering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19744935      PMCID: PMC2776078          DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.7.953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  26 in total

1.  Interference effects from divided attention during retrieval in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Myra A Fernandes; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2003-06

2.  Factors modulating the effect of divided attention during retrieval of words.

Authors:  Myra A Fernandes; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-07

3.  Different rates of forgetting following study versus test trials.

Authors:  Mark A Wheeler; Michael Ewers; Joseph F Buonanno
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2003-11

4.  The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-03

6.  Modes of cognitive control in recognition and source memory: depth of retrieval.

Authors:  Larry L Jacoby; Yujiro Shimizu; Karen A Daniels; Matthew G Rhodes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

7.  The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.

Authors:  F I Craik; R Govoni; M Naveh-Benjamin; N D Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-06

8.  An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification.

Authors:  K Murnane; U J Bayen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-07

Review 9.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Source memory and divided attention: reciprocal costs to primary and secondary tasks.

Authors:  A K Troyer; G Winocur; F I Craik; M Moscovitch
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  13 in total

1.  Divided attention: an undesirable difficulty in memory retention.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Eric Ruthruff; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-10

2.  Fidelity of neural reactivation reveals competition between memories.

Authors:  Brice A Kuhl; Jesse Rissman; Marvin M Chun; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Working memory differences in illusory recollection of critical lures.

Authors:  Michael T Bixter; Frances Daniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-07

4.  Collaborative memory and part-set cueing impairments: the role of executive depletion in modulating retrieval disruption.

Authors:  Sarah J Barber; Suparna Rajaram
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2011-05

5.  Neural correlates of reactivation and retrieval-induced distortion.

Authors:  Donna J Bridge; Ken A Paller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  The route to recall a dream: theoretical considerations and methodological implications.

Authors:  Georgina Nemeth
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-08-12

7.  Divided attention improves delayed, but not immediate retrieval of a consolidated memory.

Authors:  Yoav Kessler; Susan Vandermorris; Nigel Gopie; Alexander Daros; Gordon Winocur; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The formation of source memory under distraction.

Authors:  Heekyeong Park; Fernando Leal; Cheryl Abellanoza; James D Schaeffer
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.759

9.  The asymmetrical effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: a different view based on an interference with the episodic register.

Authors:  Jonathan Guez; Moshe Naveh-Benjamin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mindfulness Enhances Episodic Memory Performance: Evidence from a Multimethod Investigation.

Authors:  Kirk Warren Brown; Robert J Goodman; Richard M Ryan; Bhikkhu Anālayo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.