Literature DB >> 12215976

A comparison of conventional panoramic radiographs with volumetric computed tomography images in the preoperative assessment of impacted mandibular third molars.

J Pawelzik1, M Cohnen, R Willers, J Becker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In the present study, we evaluated the geometric, topographic, and anatomic reliability of volumetric computed tomography (VCT) images by comparing conventional panoramic radiographs with reconstructed VCT panoramic and paraxial images before performing third molar surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 6 anatomic sites on 10 patients who showed a topographic relationship between the apices of the third molar root and the mandibular canal were preoperatively assessed by 5 oral surgeons using conventional panoramic radiographs; these were complemented and compared with secondary reconstructed paraxial and panoramic VCT images.
RESULTS: The position of the apices in relation to the mandibular canal could be revealed on 94% of VCT reconstructed paraxial images. Assessment of VCT paraxial images could be facilitated by using a toolbar marker in 70% of the paraxial images. In 90% of the paraxial images, it was possible to assess the relationship of the mandibular canal and its adjacent anatomy. The visual grading scores for conventional panoramic images were significantly better on all 7 assessed anatomic sites compared with the reconstructed VCT panoramic images.
CONCLUSION: The results showed that the VCT paraxial images gave a significantly clearer perception of the mandibular nerve than conventional panoramic radiographs. However, conventional panoramic radiographs were shown to be better than the VCT reconstructed panoramic images and were therefore an invaluable tool in the "expert-derived" assessment and posed the potential for identifying the need for further VCT diagnostic procedures. Copyright 2002 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12215976     DOI: 10.1053/joms.2002.34399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  16 in total

1.  Necessity of 3D visualization for the removal of lower wisdom teeth: required sample size to prove non-inferiority of panoramic radiography compared to CBCT.

Authors:  Felix Roeder; Daniel Wachtlin; Ralf Schulze
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  An in vitro comparison of subjective image quality of panoramic views acquired via 2D or 3D imaging.

Authors:  P Pittayapat; D Galiti; Y Huang; K Dreesen; M Schreurs; P Couto Souza; I R F Rubira-Bullen; F H Westphalen; R Pauwels; G Kalema; G Willems; R Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Cone-beam computed tomography in assessment of periodontal ligament space: in vitro study on artificial tooth model.

Authors:  Nurdan Ozmeric; Irina Kostioutchenko; Georg Hägler; Matthias Frentzen; Pia-Merete Jervøe-Storm
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal.

Authors:  Lennart Flygare; Anders Ohman
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Assessing the need for computed tomography for lower-third-molar extraction: a survey among 322 dentists.

Authors:  S Sivolella; G Boccuzzo; E Gasparini; G De Conti; M Berengo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Investigation of an optimized scanning protocol for the dentomaxillofacial region using 320-slice multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Wei-Chan Lin; Hsueh-Han Wang; Wen-Lin Hsu; Bi-Hui Cao; De-Ji Chen; Chia-Jung Tsai
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Evaluation of trabecular pattern of mandible using fractal dimension, bone area fraction, and gray scale value: comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography.

Authors:  Guldane Magat; Sevgi Ozcan Sener
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  [3-dimensional imaging possibilities of thhe mid-face area using digital volume tomography based on a daver study of angle stable osteosynthesis].

Authors:  S Flinzberg; R Schmelzle; D Schulze; U Rother; M Heiland
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2003-08-15

9.  [Radiation exposure and 3 dimensional imaging options of SIREMOBIL Iso-C(3D) for planning surgical dental interventions].

Authors:  M Heiland; D Schulze; S Flinzberg; H Thurmann; U Rother; R Schmelzle
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2004-01-22

10.  Assessment of the proximity between the mandibular third molar and inferior alveolar canal using preoperative 3D-CT to prevent inferior alveolar nerve damage.

Authors:  Byeongmin Lee; Youngju Park; Janghoon Ahn; Jihyun Chun; Suhyun Park; Minjin Kim; Youngserk Jo; Somi Ahn; Beulha Kim; Sungbae Choi
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-09-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.