Literature DB >> 12213156

The corneal thickness and intraocular pressure story: where are we now?

Graham A Lee1, Peng T Khaw, Linda A Ficker, Peter Shah.   

Abstract

A review of the current literature was conducted regarding the effect of corneal thickness on the diagnosis of glaucoma, and the influence of excimer laser refractive surgery on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement with Goldmann applanation tonometry. In general, normals and primary open angle glaucoma patients have a similar distribution of corneal thickness; however, there is a wide variation, ranging from 427 to 716 micro m. Normal tension glaucoma patients have a tendency towards thinner corneas than normals; however, there is an overlap of thickness measurements of more than two-thirds in 95% of patients. There is a trend for ocular hypertensives to have thicker corneas than normals, but again there is an overlap of about one-third in 95% of patients. The general trend after excimer laser refractive surgery is for a decrease in IOP, with a mean fall in IOP measured of 0.63 mmHg per dioptre correction. There is, however, a large scatter of values with some patients having the same or lower IOP post-laser, but with other patients measuring higher pressures. Corneal thickness can influence IOP measurement by Goldmann applanation tonometry; however, the magnitude of the effect is subject to much individual variation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12213156     DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2002.00551.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  12 in total

1.  Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery.

Authors:  Antonios P Aristeidou; Georgios Labiris; Andreas Katsanos; Michalis Fanariotis; Nikitas C Foudoulakis; Vassilios P Kozobolis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  [The risk of glaucoma and corneal thickness].

Authors:  A G Böhm
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Blue-on-yellow perimetry and corneal thickness in patients with ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Yi-Sheng Zhong; Li-Ping Chen; Yu Cheng
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  A structural model for the in vivo human cornea including collagen-swelling interaction.

Authors:  Xi Cheng; Steven J Petsche; Peter M Pinsky
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Refractive errors.

Authors:  Ulrich Schiefer; Christina Kraus; Peter Baumbach; Judith Ungewiß; Ralf Michels
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Laser refractive surgery in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Essam Osman
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04-21

7.  Comparison of intraocular tonometry using three different non-invasive tonometers in children.

Authors:  Julia Lasseck; Thomas Jehle; Nicolas Feltgen; Wolf Alexander Lagrèze
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Correlation between the pressure-to-cornea index and both structural and functional measures of glaucoma.

Authors:  Andrea Mbv Franco; Niro Kasahara
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Prevalence of calibration errors in goldmann applanation tonometers.

Authors:  Heydar Amini; Sasan Moghimi; Mahboobe Golestani; Mahmood Jabbarvand; Reza Zarei; Mohammadreza Esmaili; Zohre Esfandiarpour; Reza Soltani-Moghadam
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2009-07

10.  Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients.

Authors:  Girish Velis; Srinivasan Kavitha; Nazlee Zebardast; Sabyasachi Sengupta; Rengaraj Venkatesh
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.