Literature DB >> 23960918

Laser refractive surgery in glaucoma patients.

Essam Osman1.   

Abstract

Glaucoma may not be an absolute contraindication to Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK), but so far it is a relative one. People who are glaucoma suspects or who have glaucoma are just as likely as any other to seek laser refractive surgery. LASIK is a popular ocular procedure, relatively pain free and it is carried out with an extremely precise computer-controlled excimer laser emission. On the other hand, glaucoma is a group of diseases manifested by optic nerve damage with visual field changes. Patients that undergo a transient but significant rise in intraocular pressure during LASIK procedure have risk of further optic nerve damage. Furthermore, steroids which are typically used after refractive surgery can increase intraocular pressure (IOP) especially in steroid responders, who are more prevalent among glaucoma patient. Glaucoma patients interested in LASIK surgery may visit a glaucoma specialist or another LASIK surgeon who has had experience with performing LASIK in glaucoma patients. PRK (photorefractive keratectomy), LASEK (laser epithelial keratomileusis) are good alternatives for glaucoma patients. Refractive surgeons might want to consider giving patients a photo of their optic nerve, or a drawing, or an objective record of their preoperative examination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corneal thickness; Glaucoma; LASIK; Laser refractive surgery

Year:  2010        PMID: 23960918      PMCID: PMC3729399          DOI: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2010.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1319-4534


  32 in total

Review 1.  LASIK vs LASEK vs PRK: advantages and indications.

Authors:  Renato Ambrósio; Steven Wilson
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.975

2.  Bilateral acute angle closure glaucoma after hyperopic LASIK correction.

Authors:  Essam A Osman; Ahmed A Alsaleh; Turki Al Turki; Saleh A Al Obeidan
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-24

Review 3.  Ultra-short pulse (femtosecond) laser surgery: initial use in LASIK flap creation.

Authors:  I Ratkay-Traub; T Juhasz; C Horvath; C Suarez; K Kiss; I Ferincz; R Kurtz
Journal:  Ophthalmol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-06

4.  Steroid-induced glaucoma after laser in situ keratomileusis associated with interface fluid.

Authors:  David Rex Hamilton; Edward E Manche; Larry F Rich; Robert K Maloney
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 5.  Considerations of glaucoma in patients undergoing corneal refractive surgery.

Authors:  Kent P Bashford; George Shafranov; Shachar Tauber; M Bruce Shields
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.048

6.  Elevated intraocular pressure-induced interlamellar stromal keratitis.

Authors:  Michael W Belin; Sadeer B Hannush; Chi-Wang Yau; Robert L Schultze
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  A prospective, contralateral eye study comparing thin-flap LASIK (sub-Bowman keratomileusis) with photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  Stephen G Slade; Daniel S Durrie; Perry S Binder
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on optic nerve head topography and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness.

Authors:  Jess T Whitson; James P McCulley; H Dwight Cavanagh; Julia Song; R Wayne Bowman; Lars Hertzog
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 9.  Normal-tension glaucoma: is it different from primary open-angle glaucoma?

Authors:  M Bruce Shields
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.761

10.  Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Faisal Ghadhfan; Ali Al-Rajhi; Michael D Wagoner
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  1 in total

1.  Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Authors:  Yang Shen; Xiangjian Su; Xiu Liu; Huamao Miao; Xuejun Fang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 2.209

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.