Literature DB >> 12210946

Single-point (constant-time) imaging in radiofrequency Fourier transform electron paramagnetic resonance.

Sankaran Subramanian1, Nallathamby Devasahayam, Ramachandran Murugesan, Kenichi Yamada, John Cook, Andrew Taube, James B Mitchell, Joost A B Lohman, Murali C Krishna.   

Abstract

This study describes the use of the single-point imaging (SPI) modality, also known as constant-time imaging (CTI), in radiofrequency (RF) Fourier transform (FT) electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). The SPI technique, commonly used for high-resolution solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging, has been successfully applied to 2D and 3D RF-FT-EPR imaging of phantoms containing narrow-line EPR spin probes. The SPI scheme is essentially a phase-encoding technique that operates by acquiring a single data point in the free induction decay (FID) after a fixed delay (phase-encoding time), following the pulsed RF excitation, in the presence of static magnetic field gradients. Since the phase-encoding time remains constant for a given image data set, the spectral information is automatically deconvolved, providing well-resolved pure spatial images. Therefore, images obtained using SPI are artifact-free and the resolution is not significantly limited by the line width, compared to the images obtained using the conventional filtered back-projection (FBP) scheme, suggesting that the SPI modality may have advantages for EPR imaging of large objects. In this work the advantages and limitations of SPI as compared to FBP are investigated by imaging suitable phantom objects. Although SPI takes longer to perform than the FBP method, optimization of the data collection scheme may increase the temporal resolution, rendering this technique suitable for in vivo studies. Spectral information can also be extracted from a series of SPI images that are generated as a function of the delay from the excitation pulse. Published 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12210946     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  37 in total

1.  Multiple-stepped Zeeman field offset method applied in acquiring enhanced resolution spin-echo electron paramagnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Payam Seifi; Boris Epel; Colin Mailer; Howard J Halpern
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Low-field magnetic resonance imaging to visualize chronic and cycling hypoxia in tumor-bearing mice.

Authors:  Hironobu Yasui; Shingo Matsumoto; Nallathamby Devasahayam; Jeeva P Munasinghe; Rajani Choudhuri; Keita Saito; Sankaran Subramanian; James B Mitchell; Murali C Krishna
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  In Vivo pO2 Imaging of Tumors: Oxymetry with Very Low-Frequency Electron Paramagnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Boris Epel; Howard J Halpern
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 1.600

4.  Integration of digital signal processing technologies with pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Randall H Pursley; Ghadi Salem; Nallathamby Devasahayam; Sankaran Subramanian; Janusz Koscielniak; Murali C Krishna; Thomas J Pohida
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Evaluation of sub-microsecond recovery resonators for in vivo electron paramagnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Hyodo; S Subramanian; N Devasahayam; R Murugesan; K Matsumoto; J B Mitchell; M C Krishna
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Absolute oxygen R1e imaging in vivo with pulse electron paramagnetic resonance.

Authors:  Boris Epel; Michael K Bowman; Colin Mailer; Howard J Halpern
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Ramped hybrid encoding for improved ultrashort echo time imaging.

Authors:  Hyungseok Jang; Curtis N Wiens; Alan B McMillan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  A rapid and robust gradient measurement technique using dynamic single-point imaging.

Authors:  Hyungseok Jang; Alan B McMillan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Accelerated 4D quantitative single point EPR imaging using model-based reconstruction.

Authors:  Hyungseok Jang; Shingo Matsumoto; Nallathamby Devasahayam; Sankaran Subramanian; Jiachen Zhuo; Murali C Krishna; Alan B McMillan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Four-channel surface coil array for 300-MHz pulsed EPR imaging: proof-of-concept experiments.

Authors:  Ayano Enomoto; Hiroshi Hirata; Shingo Matsumoto; Keita Saito; Sankaran Subramanian; Murali C Krishna; Nallathamby Devasahayam
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.