Literature DB >> 9158333

Effects of similarity, difficulty, and nontarget presentation on the time course of visual attention.

R Ward1, J Duncan, K Shapiro.   

Abstract

Long-lasting interference from an initial visual target on a subsequent one has been measured in two paradigms: rapid serial presentation of targets and nontargets at a single location, and simple presentation of two spatially separated targets. We note that comparisons between these paradigms might be invalid, since interference in each paradigm can be attributed to a different source: demands on selective attention, or demands to switch locations. We use a novel target presentation that both minimizes selection demands and eliminates location switching, yet we still find long-lasting interference. We suggest that all three paradigms discussed tap a common attentional limit. We also examine effects of similarity between targets, and effects of discrimination difficulty on the initial target. We find that similarity effects are more pronounced when nontargets are present, and we find no effect of discrimination difficulty on subsequent interference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9158333     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  22 in total

1.  Visual encoding of patterns is subject to dual-task interference.

Authors:  R Dell'Acqua; P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

2.  A crossmodal attentional blink between vision and touch.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence; Katherine Fairbank; Alan Kingstone; Anne P Hillstrom; Kimron Shapiro
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

3.  The attentional blink with targets in different spatial locations.

Authors:  T A Visser; S M Zuvic; W F Bischof; V Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

4.  A new estimation of the duration of attentional dwell time.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes; Richard Godijn; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

5.  The time course of presaccadic attention shifts.

Authors:  Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-07

6.  A density explanation of valence asymmetries in recognition memory.

Authors:  Hans Alves; Christian Unkelbach; Juliane Burghardt; Alex S Koch; Tobias Krüger; Vaughn D Becker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-08

Review 7.  Measuring and modeling attentional dwell time.

Authors:  Anders Petersen; Søren Kyllingsbæk; Claus Bundesen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

8.  Task set flexibility and feature specificity modulate the limits of temporal attention.

Authors:  Elkan G Akyürek; Charlotte Köhne; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-08-08

9.  Attentional and perceptual factors affecting the attentional blink for faces and objects.

Authors:  Ayelet N Landau; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  The attentional blink: a review of data and theory.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; René Marois
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.