Literature DB >> 27001904

Maternal exposure to radiographic exams and major structural birth defects.

Hyeyeun Lim1, Charles W Beasley2, Lawrence W Whitehead1, Robert J Emery1, A J Agopian1, Peter H Langlois3, Dorothy K Waller1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of radiologic exams are performed in the United States, but very few studies have examined the effects of maternal exposure to radiologic exams during the periconceptional period and birth defects.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between maternal exposure to radiologic exams during the periconceptional period and 19 categories of birth defects using a large population-based study of birth defects.
METHODS: We studied 27,809 case mothers and 10,200 control mothers who participated in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study and delivered between 1997 and 2009. Maternal exposure to radiologic exams that delivered ionizing radiation to the urinary tract, lumbar spine, abdomen, or pelvis were identified based on the mother's report of type of radiologic exams, organ or body part scanned and the month during which the exam occurred
RESULTS: Overall, 0.9% of mothers reported exposure to one of these types of radiographic exams during the periconceptional period. We observed significant associations between maternal exposure during the first trimester and isolated Dandy-Walker malformation (odds ratio = 7.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-33) and isolated d-transposition of the great arteries (odds ratio = 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-10.3). However, the result for isolated Dandy-Walker malformation was based on only two exposed cases.
CONCLUSION: These results should be interpreted cautiously because multiple statistical tests were conducted and measurements of exposure were based on maternal report. However, our results may be useful for generating hypotheses for future studies. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:563-572, 2016.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth defects; isolated d-transposition of the great arteries; radiography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27001904      PMCID: PMC5937123          DOI: 10.1002/bdra.23496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol        ISSN: 1542-0752


  23 in total

Review 1.  Ionizing radiations in pregnancy and teratogenesis: a review of literature.

Authors:  M De Santis; E Di Gianantonio; G Straface; A F Cavaliere; A Caruso; F Schiavon; R Berletti; M Clementi
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.143

2.  Seeking causes: Classifying and evaluating congenital heart defects in etiologic studies.

Authors:  Lorenzo D Botto; Angela E Lin; Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; Sadia Malik; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2007-10

3.  Radiation absorbed dose to the embryo/fetus from radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  J R Russell; M G Stabin; R B Sparks; E Watson
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  Induction of congenital malformations in the offspring of male mice treated with X-rays at pre-meiotic and post-meiotic stages.

Authors:  K M Kirk; M F Lyon
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Utilization of imaging in pregnant patients: 10-year review of 5270 examinations in 3285 patients--1997-2006.

Authors:  Elizabeth Lazarus; Carolynn Debenedectis; David North; Patricia K Spencer; William W Mayo-Smith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation.

Authors:  Morie M Chen; Fergus V Coakley; Anjali Kaimal; Russell K Laros
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  Diagnostic radiography in pregnancy: risks and reality.

Authors:  Sandra A Lowe
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.100

8.  Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures.

Authors:  Reza Fazel; Harlan M Krumholz; Yongfei Wang; Joseph S Ross; Jersey Chen; Henry H Ting; Nilay D Shah; Khurram Nasir; Andrew J Einstein; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Embryo/fetus radiation dose and risk from dual X-ray absorptiometry examinations.

Authors:  J Damilakis; K Perisinakis; H Vrahoriti; G Kontakis; H Varveris; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Foetal radiation dose and risk from diagnostic radiology procedures: a multinational study.

Authors:  Ernest K Osei; Johnson Darko
Journal:  ISRN Radiol       Date:  2012-09-25
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Neurocritical Care of the Pregnant Patient.

Authors:  Deepa Malaiyandi; Elysia James; Lindsay Peglar; Nurose Karim; Nicholas Henkel; Kristin Guilliams
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.598

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.