Literature DB >> 12192897

Development and assessment of the Osteoporosis Index of Risk (OSIRIS) to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry.

W B Sedrine1, T Chevallier, B Zegels, A Kvasz, M C Micheletti, B Gelas, J Y Reginster.   

Abstract

A simple questionnaire would be useful to identify individuals most in need of bone mineral density (BMD) testing. We designed a new predictive model and risk assessment instrument based on an extensive review of the literature evaluating risk factors for osteoporosis, and tested its performance in a large cohort of postmenopausal women in whom BMD was measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry. In total, 1303 postmenopausal women from an outpatient osteoporosis clinic participated in this study. The Osteoporosis Index of Risk (OSIRIS) is based on four variables: age, body weight, current hormone replacement therapy use and history of previous low impact fracture. The sensitivity and specificity for an OSIRIS value of +1 were respectively 78.5% and 51.4%. The AUC under the ROC curve of OSIRIS was 0.71. Three categories were arbitrarily created using OSIRIS, with cutoff of +1 and -3. The low risk category (OSIRIS > +1) represented 41% of all women; only 7% of the women in this category had osteoporosis. The prevalence of osteoporosis was very high (66%) among the group at high risk (OSIRIS < -3 representing 15% of all women). The prevalence of osteoporosis was 39% in the intermediate risk group (-3 < OSIRIS < +1, 44% of all women). In conclusion, OSIRIS is a simple index based on four easy-to-collect variables from postmenopausal women, it shows a high degree of accuracy, and performed well for classifying the degree of risk of osteoporosis in western European women of Caucasian lineage. Based on this instrument it is possible to propose a strategy that would initiate treatment in women with very high risk, postpone BMD measurement in women with low risk and limit BMD measurement to women with intermediate risk of osteoporosis, this would spare more than 55% of the densitometry bill compared with a mass screening scenario.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12192897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0951-3590            Impact factor:   2.260


  33 in total

Review 1.  Detecting low bone mineral density from dental radiographs: a mini-review.

Authors:  James Graham
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2015-10-26

Review 2.  Prescreening tools to determine who needs DXA.

Authors:  Elliott N Schwartz; Dee M Steinberg
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 3.  Performance of the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool in ruling out low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a systematic review.

Authors:  B Rud; J Hilden; L Hyldstrup; A Hróbjartsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Clinical performance of seven prescreening tools for osteoporosis in Iranian postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Abbas Keshtkar; Omidreza Tabatabaie; Nassim Matin; Zahra Mohammadi; Mehdi Ebrahimi; Patricia Khashayar; Mojgan Asadi
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 5.  Panoramic measures for oral bone mass in detecting osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  E Calciolari; N Donos; J C Park; A Petrie; N Mardas
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Clinical and panoramic predictors of femur bone mineral density.

Authors:  Stuart C White; Akira Taguchi; David Kao; Sam Wu; Susan K Service; Douglas Yoon; Yoshikazu Suei; Takashi Nakamoto; Keiji Tanimoto
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07-27       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  The relationship between social deprivation, osteoporosis, and falls.

Authors:  Derek Pearson; Rachel Taylor; Tahir Masud
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Development and validation of osteoporosis risk-assessment model for Korean postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Sun Min Oh; Byung-Ho Nam; Yumie Rhee; Seong-Hwan Moon; Deog Young Kim; Dae Ryong Kang; Hyeon Chang Kim
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  The validity of decision rules for selecting women with primary osteoporosis for bone mineral density testing.

Authors:  Suzanne M Cadarette; Warren J McIsaac; Gillian A Hawker; Liisa Jaakkimainen; Alison Culbert; Gihane Zarifa; Ebele Ola; Susan B Jaglal
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Risk assessment and screening for low bone mineral density in a multi-ethnic population of women and men: does one approach fit all?

Authors:  Danielle L Broussard; Jeanette H Magnus
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-12-16       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.