Literature DB >> 14685650

The relationship between social deprivation, osteoporosis, and falls.

Derek Pearson1, Rachel Taylor, Tahir Masud.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between heel BMD, risk factors for osteoporosis, falls history, and the Jarman Underprivileged Area Score in an older community population. From the general practice register, 1,187 women (mean age 70, range 60 to 94) were recruited. BMD of the heel was measured using the GE Lunar PIXI densitometer. A T-score cutoff for predicted osteoporosis at the spine or hip of -1.7 was used. A risk factor questionnaire was completed that included fracture history and falls history. The odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for each risk factor for each quartile of Jarman score and for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors that predict lone bone mass in the heel. There were no significant differences between women in different quartiles of Jarman score in terms of age and body mass index (BMI). Women in the highest two quartiles of Jarman score (i.e., most deprived) had a significantly higher likelihood of osteoporosis (OR=1.82; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.63; and OR=1.85; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.64, respectively) and significantly lower BMD ( p=0.008). Women in these two quartiles were significantly more likely to have had a history of previous fracture (OR=1.66; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.53), but there was no difference in falls history. Women in the lowest quartile (least deprived) were also significantly less likely to smoke ( p=0.011) but were not significantly different in terms of other risk factors (e.g., dietary calcium and activity). BMI, age, kyphosis, significant visual problems, and quartile of Jarman score were significant risk factors for low bone mass. Risk factors identified those with low bone mass at the heel with a sensitivity and specificity of 72%. In conclusion, women in the lowest quartile of Jarman score (i.e., least deprived) have significantly higher heel BMD compared with the rest of the population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14685650     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-003-1499-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  27 in total

1.  Prevalence and risk factors of low quantitative ultrasound values of calcaneus in Korean elderly women.

Authors:  C H Kim; Y I Kim; C S Choi; J Y Park; M S Lee; S I Lee; G S Kim
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  A clinical prediction rule to identify premenopausal women with low bone mass.

Authors:  G A Hawker; S A Jamal; R Ridout; C Chase
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Risk factors for fractures of the proximal humerus: results from the EPIDOS prospective study.

Authors:  Sun H Lee; Patricia Dargent-Molina; Gérard Bréart
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 4.  Can we detect women with low bone mass using clinical risk factors?

Authors:  C Ribot; F Tremollieres; J M Pouilles
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1995-02-27       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  In elderly women weight is the best predictor of a very low bone mineral density: evidence from the EPIDOS study.

Authors:  P Dargent-Molina; F Poitiers; G Bréart
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Quantitative ultrasound or clinical risk factors--which best identifies women at risk of osteoporosis?

Authors:  A Stewart; D M Reid
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Occurrence of hip fractures and socioeconomic position.

Authors:  W E Bacon; W C Hadden
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2000-05

8.  Screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Mark Helfand; Steven H Woolf; Janet D Allan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  A multicenter, case control study of risk factors for low tibial speed of sound among residents of urban areas in Turkey.

Authors:  Fatma Inanici-Ersöz; Yeşim Gökçe-Kutsal; Sema Oncel; Merih Eryavuz; Ozlen Peker; Seniz Ok
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.631

10.  Predictors of first hip fracture and mortality post fracture in older women.

Authors:  P Fitzpatrick; P N Kirke; L Daly; I Van Rooij; E Dinn; H Burke; J Heneghan; G Bourke; J Masterson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.089

View more
  11 in total

1.  Does socioeconomic status influence the epidemiology and outcome of distal radial fractures in adults?

Authors:  N D Clement; A D Duckworth; N R Wickramasinghe; C M Court-Brown; M M McQueen
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-06-21

2.  Socioeconomic influences on bone health in postmenopausal women: findings from NHANES III, 1988-1994.

Authors:  May-Choo Wang; L Beth Dixon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  The role of socioeconomic status on hip fracture.

Authors:  D S Zingmond; N F Soohoo; S L Silverman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Socioeconomic status and bone health in community-dwelling older men: the CHAMP Study.

Authors:  I Nabipour; R Cumming; D J Handelsman; M Litchfield; V Naganathan; L Waite; H Creasey; M Janu; D Le Couteur; P N Sambrook; M J Seibel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  The prevalence and risk factors of vertebral fractures in Korea.

Authors:  Chan Soo Shin; Min Joo Kim; Sang Mi Shim; Jin Taek Kim; Sung Hoon Yu; Bo Kyung Koo; Hwa Young Cho; Hyung Jin Choi; Sun Wook Cho; Sang Wan Kim; Seong Yeon Kim; Seung-O Yang; Nam H Cho
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  FRAX provides robust fracture prediction regardless of socioeconomic status.

Authors:  S L Brennan; W D Leslie; L M Lix; H Johansson; A Oden; E McCloskey; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  The association between fracture rates and neighborhood characteristics in Washington, DC, children.

Authors:  Leticia Manning Ryan; Mark Guagliardo; Stephen J Teach; Jichuan Wang; Jennifer E Marsh; Steven A Singer; Joseph L Wright; James M Chamberlain
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Poverty is a risk factor for osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  M C Navarro; M Sosa; P Saavedra; P Lainez; M Marrero; M Torres; C D Medina
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  FRAX predicts incident falls in elderly men: findings from MrOs Sweden.

Authors:  N C Harvey; H Johansson; A Odén; M K Karlsson; B E Rosengren; Ö Ljunggren; C Cooper; E McCloskey; J A Kanis; C Ohlsson; D Mellström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The Oslo Health Study: Is bone mineral density higher in affluent areas?

Authors:  Kari Alver; Anne J Søgaard; Jan A Falch; Haakon E Meyer
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2007-11-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.