Literature DB >> 12184828

Severe inbreeding depression in collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis).

Loeske E B Kruuk1, Ben C Sheldon, Juha Merilä.   

Abstract

The causes and magnitude of inbreeding depression are of considerable importance for a wide range of issues in evolutionary and conservation biology, but we have only a limited understanding of inbreeding depression in natural populations. Here, we present a study of inbreeding in a large wild population of collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis). Inbreeding was rare, to the extent that we detected only 1.04% of 2139 matings over 18 years that resulted in offspring with a non-zero inbreeding coefficient, f > 0. When it did occur, inbreeding caused a significant reduction in the egg-hatching rate, in fledgling skeletal size and in post-fledging juvenile survival, with the number of offspring being recruited to the breeding population from a nest of f = 0.25 being reduced by 94% relative to a non-inbred nest. A maximum-likelihood estimate of the number of lethal equivalents per gamete was very high at B = 7.47, indicating a substantial genetic load in this population. There was also a non-significant tendency for inbreeding depression to increase with the strength of selection on a trait. The probability of mating between close relatives (f = 0.25) increased throughout the breeding season, possibly reflecting increased costs of inbreeding avoidance. Our results illustrate how severe inbreeding depression and considerable genetic load may exist in natural populations, but detecting them may require extensive long-term datasets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12184828      PMCID: PMC1691074          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  13 in total

1.  A population founded by a single pair of individuals: establishment, expansion, and evolution.

Authors:  P R Grant; B R Grant; K Petren
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  The influence of parental relatedness on reproductive success.

Authors:  W Amos; J W Wilmer; K Fullard; T M Burg; J P Croxall; D Bloch; T Coulson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Hybridization and adaptive mate choice in flycatchers.

Authors:  T Veen; T Borge; S C Griffith; G P Saetre; S Bures; L Gustafsson; B C Sheldon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-03       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  AN ESTIMATE OF THE MUTATIONAL DAMAGE IN MAN FROM DATA ON CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES.

Authors:  N E Morton; J F Crow; H J Muller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1956-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Microsatellite diversity predicts recruitment of sibling great reed warblers.

Authors:  B Hansson; S Bensch; D Hasselquist; M Akesson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Inbreeding depression in the wild.

Authors:  P Crnokrak; D A Roff
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Inbreeding depression influences lifetime breeding success in a wild population of red deer (Cervus elaphus).

Authors:  J Slate; L E Kruuk; T C Marshall; J M Pemberton; T H Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Sexual selection resulting from extrapair paternity in collared flycatchers.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 9.  Explaining stasis: microevolutionary studies in natural populations.

Authors:  J Merilä; B C Sheldon; L E Kruuk
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice.

Authors:  S Meagher; D J Penn; W K Potts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the "animal model".

Authors:  Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Genetic similarity and hatching success in birds.

Authors:  Claire Spottiswoode; Anders Pape Møller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sensitive males: inbreeding depression in an endangered bird.

Authors:  Patricia Brekke; Peter M Bennett; Jinliang Wang; Nathalie Pettorelli; John G Ewen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Inbreeding causes early death in a passerine bird.

Authors:  N L Hemmings; J Slate; T R Birkhead
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Severe inbreeding depression in a wild wolf (Canis lupus) population.

Authors:  Olof Liberg; Henrik Andrén; Hans-Christian Pedersen; Håkan Sand; Douglas Sejberg; Petter Wabakken; Mikael Kesson; Staffan Bensch
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 6.  Wild pedigrees: the way forward.

Authors:  J M Pemberton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Adult survival and microsatellite diversity in possums: effects of major histocompatibility complex-linked microsatellite diversity but not multilocus inbreeding estimators.

Authors:  Sam C Banks; Jean Dubach; Karen L Viggers; David B Lindenmayer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  On the consequences of ignoring purging on genetic recommendations for minimum viable population rules.

Authors:  A García-Dorado
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Inbred burying beetles suffer fitness costs from making poor decisions.

Authors:  Jon Richardson; Pauline Comin; Per T Smiseth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Trapped in the extinction vortex? Strong genetic effects in a declining vertebrate population.

Authors:  Donald Blomqvist; Angela Pauliny; Mikael Larsson; Lars-Ake Flodin
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.