Literature DB >> 12182699

Insect-resistant transgenic plants in a multi-trophic context.

Astrid T Groot1, Marcel Dicke.   

Abstract

So far, genetic engineering of plants in the context of insect pest control has involved insertion of genes that code for toxins, and may be characterized as the incorporation of biopesticides into classical plant breeding. In the context of pesticide usage in pest control, natural enemies of herbivores have received increasing attention, because carnivorous arthropods are an important component of insect pest control. However, in plant breeding programmes, natural enemies of herbivores have largely been ignored, although there are many examples that show that plant breeding affects the effectiveness of biological control. Negative influences of modified plant characteristics on carnivorous arthropods may induce population growth of new, even more harmful pest species that had no pest status prior to the pesticide treatment. Sustainable pest management will only be possible when negative effects on non-target, beneficial arthropods are minimized. In this review, we summarize the effects of insect-resistant crops and insect-resistant transgenic crops, especially Bt crops, from a food web perspective. As food web components, we distinguish target herbivores, non-target herbivores, pollinators, parasitoids and predators. Below-ground organisms such as Collembola, nematodes and earthworms should also be included in risk assessment studies, but have received little attention. The toxins produced in Bt plants retain their toxicity when bound to the soil, so accumulation of these toxins is likely to occur. Earthworms ingest the bound toxins but are not affected by them. However, earthworms may function as intermediaries through which the toxins are passed on to other trophic levels. In studies where effects of insect-resistant (Bt) plants on natural enemies were considered, positive, negative and no effects have been found. So far, most studies have concentrated on natural enemies of target herbivores. However, Bt toxins are structurally rearranged when they bind to midgut receptors, so that they are likely to lose their toxicity inside target herbivores. What happens to the toxins in non-target herbivores, and whether these herbivores may act as intermediaries through which the toxins may be passed on to the natural enemies, remains to be studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12182699     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01366.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant J        ISSN: 0960-7412            Impact factor:   6.417


  18 in total

1.  Transgenic insect-resistant corn affects the fourth trophic level: effects of Bacillus thuringiensis-corn on the facultative hyperparasitoid Tetrastichus howardi.

Authors:  Gernot Prütz; Andreas Brink; Konrad Dettner
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-08-24

2.  Awareness of hormesis will enhance future research in basic and applied neuroscience.

Authors:  Mark P Mattson
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 3.  Will transgenic plants adversely affect the environment?

Authors:  Vassili V Velkov; Alexander B Medvinsky; Mikhail S Sokolov; Anatoly I Marchenko
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Assessing the effects of Bt Maize on the predatory mite Neoseiulus cucumeris.

Authors:  Lena B Obrist; Heiri Klein; Anna Dutton; Franz Bigler
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Effects of transgenic cry1Ie maize on non-lepidopteran pest abundance, diversity and community composition.

Authors:  Jingfei Guo; Kanglai He; Shuxiong Bai; Tiantao Zhang; Yunjun Liu; Fuxin Wang; Zhenying Wang
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  Tailoring the specificity of a plant cystatin toward herbivorous insect digestive cysteine proteases by single mutations at positively selected amino acid sites.

Authors:  Marie-Claire Goulet; Cindy Dallaire; Louis-Philippe Vaillancourt; Moustafa Khalf; Amine M Badri; Andreja Preradov; Marc-Olivier Duceppe; Charles Goulet; Conrad Cloutier; Dominique Michaud
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 7.  Six years after the commercial introduction of Bt maize in Spain: field evaluation, impact and future prospects.

Authors:  Matilde Eizaguirre; Ramon Albajes; Carmen López; Jordi Eras; Belén Lumbierres; Xavier Pons
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.788

8.  Bitrophic and tritrophic effects of Bt Cry3A transgenic potato on beneficial, non-target, beetles.

Authors:  Natalie Ferry; Evan A Mulligan; Michael E N Majerus; Angharad M R Gatehouse
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  Limitations in dose-response and surrogate species methodologies for risk assessment of Cry toxins on arthropod natural enemies.

Authors:  Débora P Paula; David A Andow; André Bellinati; Renata Velozo Timbó; Lucas M Souza; Carmen S S Pires; Edison R Sujii
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  Prey-mediated effects of transgenic canola on a beneficial, non-target, carabid beetle.

Authors:  Natalie Ferry; Evan A Mulligan; C Neal Stewart; Bruce E Tabashnik; Gordon R Port; Angharad M R Gatehouse
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.145

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.