Literature DB >> 26846212

Limitations in dose-response and surrogate species methodologies for risk assessment of Cry toxins on arthropod natural enemies.

Débora P Paula1, David A Andow2, André Bellinati3,4, Renata Velozo Timbó3,4, Lucas M Souza3, Carmen S S Pires3, Edison R Sujii3.   

Abstract

Dose-response assays and surrogate species are standard methods for risk analysis for environmental chemicals. These assume that individuals within a species have unimodal responses and that a surrogate species can predict responses of other related taxa. We exposed immature individuals of closely related aphidophagous coccinellid predators, Cycloneda sanguinea and Harmonia axyridis, to Cry1Ac and Cry1F toxins through uniform and constant artificial tritrophic exposure through Myzus persicae aphids. Both toxins were detected in coccinellid pupae, with individual and interspecific variation. Uptake was significantly higher in H. axyridis than in C. sanguinea, both in the proportion of individuals and the concentrations per individual. We also observed bimodal uptake of the Cry toxins by H. axyridis, which indicated that some individuals had low bioaccumulation and some had high bioaccumulation. This suggests that standard dose-response assays need to be interpreted with caution and future assays should examine the modality of the responses. In addition, the similarity in the biological effects of the Cry toxins in the two predators was due to different biological exposure mechanisms. The majority of H. axyridis were exposed both internally and in the gut, while C. sanguinea was exposed primarily in the gut. Thus, despite their close phylogenetic relatedness, these species would not be good surrogates for each other and the surrogate species methodology should be tested more rigorously.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coccinellid; GM crops; Predator; Surrogacy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26846212     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-016-1619-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  12 in total

1.  Uptake and bioaccumulation of Cry toxins by an aphidophagous predator.

Authors:  Débora P Paula; David A Andow
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  A tiered system for assessing the risk of genetically modified plants to non-target organisms.

Authors:  Monica Garcia-Alonso; Erik Jacobs; Alan Raybould; Thomas E Nickson; Peter Sowig; Hilde Willekens; Pier Van der Kouwe; Raymond Layton; Firoz Amijee; Angel M Fuentes; Francesca Tencalla
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2007-03-01

3.  Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods.

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Detlef Bartsch; Franz Bigler; Marco P Candolfi; Marco M C Gielkens; Susan E Hartley; Richard L Hellmich; Joseph E Huesing; Paul C Jepson; Raymond Layton; Hector Quemada; Alan Raybould; Robyn I Rose; Joachim Schiemann; Mark K Sears; Anthony M Shelton; Jeremy Sweet; Zigfridas Vaituzis; Jeffrey D Wolt
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Ecotoxicological evaluation of propranolol hydrochloride and losartan potassium to Lemna minor L. (1753) individually and in binary mixtures.

Authors:  Aline A Godoy; Fábio Kummrow; Paulo Augusto Z Pamplin
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Direct and indirect sublethal effects of Galanthus nivalis agglutinin (GNA) on the development of a potato-aphid parasitoid, Aphelinus abdominalis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae).

Authors:  A Couty; G de la Viña; S J. Clark; L Kaiser; M -H. Pham-Delègue; G M. Poppy
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.354

6.  Deconstructing the surrogate species concept: a life history approach to the protection of ecosystem services.

Authors:  John E Banks; John D Stark; Roger I Vargas; Azmy S Ackleh
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  Multi-generation effects of Bt rice on Anagrus nilaparvatae, a parasitoid of the nontarget pest Nilapavarta lugens.

Authors:  Ming-Qing Gao; Shou-Peng Hou; De-Qiang Pu; Min Shi; Gong-Yin Ye; Xue-Xin Chen
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.377

8.  Quantification of Cry1Ac and Cry1F Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal proteins in selected transgenic cotton plant tissue types.

Authors:  M Willrich Siebert; T G Patterson; G J Gilles; S P Nolting; L B Braxton; B R Leonard; J W Van Duyn; R B Lassiter
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 9.  Insect-resistant transgenic plants in a multi-trophic context.

Authors:  Astrid T Groot; Marcel Dicke
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 10.  The end of a myth-Bt (Cry1Ab) maize does not harm green lacewings.

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Michael Meissle; Steven E Naranjo; Yunhe Li; Franz Bigler
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  1 in total

1.  Impact of transgenic soybean expressing Cry1Ac and Cry1F proteins on the non-target arthropod community associated with soybean in Brazil.

Authors:  Luiz H Marques; Antonio C Santos; Boris A Castro; Nicholas P Storer; Jonathan M Babcock; Miles D Lepping; Verissimo Sa; Valéria F Moscardini; Dwain M Rule; Odair A Fernandes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.