Literature DB >> 12180617

Minimum ten-year follow-up of cemented total hip replacement in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Thomas M Fyda1, John J Callaghan, Jason Olejniczak, Richard C Johnston.   

Abstract

Between November 1970 and September 1984 the senior author performed fifty-three consecutive total hip arthroplasties with cement in forty-one patients with the diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Five hips in three patients with failed renal transplants requiring chronic hemodialysis were excluded. At the time of final review, a minimum of ten years after the procedure, twenty-one patients (twenty-eight hips) were living, fifteen patients (eighteen hips) had died, and two patients (two hips) were lost to follow-up. A minimum ten-year follow-up radiograph was obtained on twenty-two (79%) of the hips in surviving patients. During the follow-up period 17.4% of hips (eight hips) required revision: 13.0% (six hips) for aseptic loosening, 2.2% (one hip) for sepsis, and 2.2% (one hip) for recurrent dislocation. All eight revisions occurred in patients living at time of final review, giving a revision prevalence of 22.9% (17.1% for aseptic loosening, 2.9% for sepsis, and 2.9% for recurrent dislocation) in patients surviving ten years. The prevalence of revision of the femoral component for aseptic loosening was 6.5% (three hips) for all hips and 9.1% (three hips) in patients surviving at least ten years. The prevalence of femoral aseptic loosening, defined as those components revised for aseptic loosening and those that demonstrated definite or probable radiographic loosening, was 13.0% (six hips) for all hips and 28.6% (six hips) for hips with at least ten-year radiographic follow-up. The prevalence of revision of the acetabular component for aseptic loosening was 13.0% (six hips) for all hips and 18.2% (six hips) in patients surviving at least ten years. The prevalence of acetabular aseptic loosening was 15.2% (seven hips) for all hips and 29.2% (seven hips) for hips with at least ten-year radiographic follow-up. In patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head survivorship was significantly inferior to that in the senior author's overall patient population with regard to revision for aseptic loosening (p=0.019), revision for acetabular loosening (p=0.01), revision for femoral loosening (p=0.008), and aseptic femoral loosening (p=0.004). Survivorship to aseptic acetabular loosening was not significantly different (p=0.32). Young age at the time of surgery significantly increased the risk of subsequent component loosening (p<0.008) and revision due to aseptic loosening (p<0.002). These findings demonstrate the relatively poor durability of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head as compared to patients with other diagnoses and suggest that the younger age in this patient population compromises results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12180617      PMCID: PMC1888371     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  46 in total

1.  Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component.

Authors:  J Livermore; D Ilstrup; B Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Accumulative cell stress: the multifactorial etiology of idiopathic osteonecrosis.

Authors:  J E Kenzora; M J Glimcher
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Treatment of idiopathic osteonecrosis: the current philosophy and rationale.

Authors:  J E Kenzora
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  Total hip replacement in patients younger than thirty years old. A five-year follow-up study.

Authors:  H P Chandler; F T Reineck; R L Wixson; J C McCarthy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Biologic fixation arthroplasty in the treatment of osteonecrosis.

Authors:  C A Engh; F E Gloss; J D Bobyn
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  Long-term follow-up of total hip replacement in patients with osteonecrosis.

Authors:  C N Cornell; E A Salvati; P M Pellicci
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Loosening of the femoral component after use of the medullary-plug cementing technique. Follow-up note with a minimum five-year follow-up.

Authors:  W H Harris; W A McGann
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Bone histology in adults with aseptic necrosis. Histomorphometric evaluation of iliac biopsies in seventy-seven patients.

Authors:  M E Arlot; M Bonjean; P M Chavassieux; P J Meunier
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  A comparison of osteonecrosis and osteoarthritis patients following total hip arthroplasty. A long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  M A Ritter; J B Meding
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Total hip arthroplasties in patients less than forty-five years old.

Authors:  L D Dorr; G K Takei; J P Conaty
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Osteonecrosis is not a predictor of poor outcomes in primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Henning R Johannson; Michael G Zywiel; David R Marker; Lynne C Jones; Mike S McGrath; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  SAS weekly rounds: avascular necrosis.

Authors:  Thomas W Hamilton; Susan M Goodman; Mark Figgie
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2009-03-18

3.  Femoral resurfacing in young patients with hematologic cancer and osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Evguenia J Karimova; Shesh N Rai; Jianrong Wu; Lunetha Britton; Sue C Kaste; Michael D Neel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Minimum ten year results of total hip arthroplasty with the acetabular reinforcement ring in avascular osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Peter P Koch; Moritz Tannast; Hiroshi Fujita; Klaus Siebenrock; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis in the United States: 16-year analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Aaron J Johnson; Michael A Mont; Audrey K Tsao; Lynne C Jones
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Total hip arthroplasty in advanced osteonecrosis: the short-term results by metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Firooz Madadi; Alireza Eajazi; Seyyed Morteza Kazemi; Armin Aalami Harandi; Firoozeh Madadi; Seyyed Reza Sharifzadeh
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-02

7.  Increased risk of revision in patients with non-traumatic femoral head necrosis.

Authors:  Camilla Bergh; Ann M Fenstad; Ove Furnes; Göran Garellick; Leif I Havelin; Søren Overgaard; Alma B Pedersen; Keijo T Mäkelä; Pekka Pulkkinen; Maziar Mohaddes; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Modified trapdoor procedures using autogenous tricortical iliac graft without preserving the broken cartilage for treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a prospective cohort study with historical controls.

Authors:  Qi Cheng; Feng-Chao Zhao; Shi-Zhuang Xu; Li Zheng; Xin Zheng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.