BACKGROUND: Many surgical interventions are used to treat osteonecrosis of the femoral head. The instance and distribution of these various procedures may give some insight into the practicing community's understanding of the efficacy of these treatments. We therefore sought to determine trends in the types and numbers of procedures performed for atraumatic osteonecrosis from 1992 through 2008 in the United States. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How has the overall incidence of surgical treatment for atraumatic osteonecrosis changed over this time period; and (2) how has the percentage of THA performed for osteonecrosis (compared with joint-preserving procedures) changed over this time period? METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to collect information for all patients who had an International Classification of Diseases, 9(th) Revision diagnosis of hip osteonecrosis between 1992 and 2008. Procedures were collated according to frequency, and trends were analyzed for joint-preserving and joint-replacing procedures. RESULTS: The total number of procedures performed over this time period for osteonecrosis of the hip increased from 3570 procedures to 6400 procedures per year. In 1992, 75% (n = 2678) of the procedures performed to treat osteonecrosis of the hip were THA, which increased to 88% (n = 5632) in 2008. The percentage of joint-preserving procedures consequently decreased from 25% to 12% over this period. CONCLUSIONS: Previously, THA was believed to have poor survivorship and clinical results for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the hip, but reports since 1993 have suggested improved survivorship of these reconstructions. Our study suggests that surgeons have incorporated this into their practice patterns, in that an increasing percentage of patients with this diagnosis are treated with THA. Additionally, the total number of procedures performed for osteonecrosis has increased, which may reflect an improved awareness of this disease and more aggressive approaches to diagnosis and treatment.
BACKGROUND: Many surgical interventions are used to treat osteonecrosis of the femoral head. The instance and distribution of these various procedures may give some insight into the practicing community's understanding of the efficacy of these treatments. We therefore sought to determine trends in the types and numbers of procedures performed for atraumatic osteonecrosis from 1992 through 2008 in the United States. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How has the overall incidence of surgical treatment for atraumatic osteonecrosis changed over this time period; and (2) how has the percentage of THA performed for osteonecrosis (compared with joint-preserving procedures) changed over this time period? METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to collect information for all patients who had an International Classification of Diseases, 9(th) Revision diagnosis of hip osteonecrosis between 1992 and 2008. Procedures were collated according to frequency, and trends were analyzed for joint-preserving and joint-replacing procedures. RESULTS: The total number of procedures performed over this time period for osteonecrosis of the hip increased from 3570 procedures to 6400 procedures per year. In 1992, 75% (n = 2678) of the procedures performed to treat osteonecrosis of the hip were THA, which increased to 88% (n = 5632) in 2008. The percentage of joint-preserving procedures consequently decreased from 25% to 12% over this period. CONCLUSIONS: Previously, THA was believed to have poor survivorship and clinical results for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the hip, but reports since 1993 have suggested improved survivorship of these reconstructions. Our study suggests that surgeons have incorporated this into their practice patterns, in that an increasing percentage of patients with this diagnosis are treated with THA. Additionally, the total number of procedures performed for osteonecrosis has increased, which may reflect an improved awareness of this disease and more aggressive approaches to diagnosis and treatment.
Authors: Toshiyuki Kawai; Yaser Shanjani; Saba Fazeli; Anthony W Behn; Yaichiro Okuzu; Stuart B Goodman; Yunzhi P Yang Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2017-08-21 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: William Mayers; Brian Schwartz; Aaron Schwartz; Vincent Moretti; Wayne Goldstein; Ritesh Shah Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Thilo Floerkemeier; Stefan Budde; Nils Wirries; Gabriela von Lewinski; Henning Windhagen; Marco Ezechieli Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Masahiro Maruyama; Akira Nabeshima; Chi-Chun Pan; Anthony W Behn; Timothy Thio; Tzuhua Lin; Jukka Pajarinen; Toshiyuki Kawai; Michiaki Takagi; Stuart B Goodman; Yunzhi Peter Yang Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2018-09-20 Impact factor: 12.479