Literature DB >> 32549961

Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Aseptic Loosening.

Yuichi Kuroda1, Shinya Hayashi1, Shingo Hashimoto1, Tomoyuki Matsumoto1, Koji Takayama1, Ryosuke Kuroda1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the relationships between preoperative or intraoperative patient factors and postoperative quality of life (QOL) after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of our study was to identify the predictors of QOL after revision THA for aseptic loosening.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients who underwent revision THA for aseptic loosening were included in the present study. Preoperative hip function was evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. The patients' QOL after surgery was evaluated with EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) assessment at the end of the 2-year follow-up. The patients were then divided into two groups: good QOL (score ≥ 0.6) and poor QOL (score < 0.6). Predictive factors (i.e., age, BMI, preoperative JOA score, and the degree of acetabular bone defect according to the Paprosky classification) were compared between both QOL groups. Furthermore, multiple linear regression was performed to assess independent factors affecting the QOL.
RESULTS: Significant differences between the good and poor QOL groups were identified for BMI, walking ability, and severity of acetabular bone defect (BMI: 21.5 ± 2.9 vs. 24.1 ± 4.3, P = 0.0331; walking ability: 11.5 ± 5.0 vs. 5.5 ± 4.9, P = 0.0058; acetabular bone defect: 44.4% vs. 81.0%, P = 0.0103). The walking ability independently affected the EQ-5D utility score.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that a higher BMI, lower walking ability, and more severe acetabular bone defect are predictors of lower QOL after revision THA for aseptic loosening. In particular, the walking ability was the only independent factor. Thus, surgeons should pay attention to the postoperative management of patients with these risk factors. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabular bone defect; Body mass index (BMI); Patient factor; Quality of life (QOL); Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA)

Year:  2020        PMID: 32549961      PMCID: PMC7270434          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00057-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  29 in total

1.  The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register.

Authors:  Henrik Malchau; Peter Herberts; Thomas Eisler; Göran Garellick; Peter Söderman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Measurement of the quality of life in rheumatic disorders using the EuroQol.

Authors:  F Wolfe; D J Hawley
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1997-07

3.  Obesity is Associated With Early Total Hip Revision for Aseptic Loosening.

Authors:  Ali J Electricwala; Rapeepat Narkbunnam; James I Huddleston; William J Maloney; Stuart B Goodman; Derek F Amanatullah
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  W G Paprosky; P G Perona; J M Lawrence
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Morbid obesity: a significant risk factor for failure of two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty for infection.

Authors:  Matthew T Houdek; Eric R Wagner; Chad D Watts; Douglas R Osmon; Arlen D Hanssen; David G Lewallen; Tad M Mabry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The natural course of osteoarthritis of the hip due to subluxation or acetabular dysplasia.

Authors:  Y Hasegawa; H Iwata; M Mizuno; E Genda; S Sato; T Miura
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Early complications after one hundred and forty-four consecutive hip revisions with impacted morselized allograft bone and cement.

Authors:  Ewald Ornstein; Isam Atroshi; Herbert Franzén; Ragnar Johnsson; Per Sandquist; Martin Sundberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Long-term outcome following total hip arthroplasty: a controlled longitudinal study.

Authors:  Janet Cushnaghan; David Coggon; Isabel Reading; Peter Croft; Patricia Byng; Ken Cox; Paul Dieppe; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-12-15

9.  Quality of life and functionality after total hip arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Massimo Mariconda; Olimpio Galasso; Giovan Giuseppe Costa; Pasquale Recano; Simone Cerbasi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Preoperative function and gender predict pattern of functional recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Deborah M Kennedy; Steven E Hanna; Paul W Stratford; Jean Wessel; Jeffrey D Gollish
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.