Literature DB >> 12177181

Spontaneous versus reinforced olfactory discriminations.

Christiane Linster1, Brett A Johnson, Alix Morse, Esther Yue, Michael Leon.   

Abstract

When the major response domains in the rat olfactory bulb that are evoked by odorant enantiomers are compared, some of these odorant pairs do not show significantly different activity patterns. Such pairs are not spontaneously discriminated in a behavioral test. We show here that even these similar odorants appear to evoke different activity patterns when every data point in a glomerular activity array is compared. These odorants also can be discriminated if they are subjected to differential reinforcement. These data suggest that the method chosen to assess olfactory discrimination will reveal different olfactory capabilities of rats. The small differences in glomerular activity that probably exist between any pair of odorants may serve as a basis for odor discrimination when rats are differentially reinforced, thereby establishing the remarkable limits of rat olfactory perception. At the same time, the major differences in glomerular responses appear to serve as the normal basis for spontaneous odor discrimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12177181      PMCID: PMC6757865          DOI: 20026739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  19 in total

1.  Olfactory discrimination ability and odor structure-activity relationships in honeybees.

Authors:  M Laska; C G Galizia; M Giurfa; R Menzel
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Perceptual correlates of neural representations evoked by odorant enantiomers.

Authors:  C Linster; B A Johnson; E Yue; A Morse; Z Xu; E E Hingco; Y Choi; M Choi; A Messiha; M Leon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Olfactory discrimination ability of human subjects for ten pairs of enantiomers.

Authors:  M Laska; P Teubner
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Spatial coding of enantiomers in the rat olfactory bulb.

Authors:  B D Rubin; L C Katz
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Enantioselectivity of odor perception in honeybees (Apis mellifera carnica).

Authors:  M Laska; C G Galizia
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Evidence for the difference between the odours of the optical isomers (4)- and (-)-carvone.

Authors:  T J Leitereg; D G Guadagni; J Harris; T R Mon; R Teranishi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1971-04-16       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Odor incongruity and chirality.

Authors:  L Friedman; J G Miller
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-06-04       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Generalization between binary odor mixtures and their components in the rat.

Authors:  C Linster; B H Smith
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1999-06

9.  Modular representations of odorants in the glomerular layer of the rat olfactory bulb and the effects of stimulus concentration.

Authors:  B A Johnson; M Leon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2000-07-10       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Enantioselectivity of odor perception in squirrel monkeys and humans.

Authors:  M Laska; A Liesen; P Teubner
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1999-10
View more
  53 in total

1.  Configurational and elemental odor mixture perception can arise from local inhibition.

Authors:  Christiane Linster; Thomas A Cleland
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Accessory olfactory bulb function is modulated by input from the main olfactory epithelium.

Authors:  Burton Slotnick; Diego Restrepo; Heather Schellinck; Georgina Archbold; Stephen Price; Weihong Lin
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Neural correlates of olfactory learning: Critical role of centrifugal neuromodulation.

Authors:  Max L Fletcher; Wei R Chen
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Characterizing olfactory binary mixture interactions in Fischer 344 rats using behavioral reaction times.

Authors:  Wendy M Yoder; Leslie Gaynor; Ethan Windham; Michelle Lyman; Olivia Munizza; Barry Setlow; Jennifer L Bizon; David W Smith
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 5.  Plasticity in the olfactory system: lessons for the neurobiology of memory.

Authors:  D A Wilson; A R Best; R M Sullivan
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.519

6.  Relational representation in the olfactory system.

Authors:  Thomas A Cleland; Brett A Johnson; Michael Leon; Christiane Linster
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Rapid Bayesian learning in the mammalian olfactory system.

Authors:  Naoki Hiratani; Peter E Latham
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Multiple learning parameters differentially regulate olfactory generalization.

Authors:  Thomas A Cleland; Venkata Anupama Narla; Karim Boudadi
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Mice lacking NKCC1 have normal olfactory sensitivity.

Authors:  David W Smith; Sokunthirith Thach; Erika L Marshall; Mary-Grace Mendoza; Steven J Kleene
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-08-01

10.  Encoding of mixtures in a simple olfactory system.

Authors:  Kai Shen; Sina Tootoonian; Gilles Laurent
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.