Literature DB >> 10480679

Olfactory discrimination ability and odor structure-activity relationships in honeybees.

M Laska1, C G Galizia, M Giurfa, R Menzel.   

Abstract

Using the training procedure introduced by von Frisch in 1919, we tested the ability of free-flying honeybees to discriminate a conditioning odor from an array of 44 simultaneously presented substances. The stimuli included homologous series of aliphatic alcohols, aldehydes and ketones, isomeric forms of some of these substances, as well as several terpenes and odor mixtures, and thus comprised stimuli of varying degrees of structural similarity to any conditioning odor. We found (i) that the honeybees significantly distinguished between 97.0% of the 1848 odor pairs tested, thus showing an excellent discrimination performance when tested in a free-flying situation with an array of structurally related substances; (ii) a significant negative correlation between discrimination performance and structural similarity of odorants in terms of differences in carbon chain length with all aliphatic substance classes tested; (iii) that both the position and type of a functional group also affected discriminability of odorants in a substance class-specific manner; and (iv) striking similarities in odor structure-activity relationships between honeybees and human and nonhuman primates tested previously on a subset of substances employed here. Our findings demonstrate that the similarities found in the structural organization of the olfactory systems of insects and vertebrates are paralleled by striking similarities in relative discrimination abilities. This strongly suggests that similar mechanisms of odor coding and discrimination may underlie olfaction in vertebrates and insects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10480679     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/24.4.429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  35 in total

1.  Perceptual correlates of neural representations evoked by odorant enantiomers.

Authors:  C Linster; B A Johnson; E Yue; A Morse; Z Xu; E E Hingco; Y Choi; M Choi; A Messiha; M Leon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Cross-modal interaction between visual and olfactory learning in Apis cerana.

Authors:  Li-Zhen Zhang; Shao-Wu Zhang; Zi-Long Wang; Wei-Yu Yan; Zhi-Jiang Zeng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Feeding responses of free-flying honeybees to secondary compounds mimicking floral nectars.

Authors:  Natarajan Singaravelan; Gidi Nee'man; Moshe Inbar; Ido Izhaki
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2005-12-18       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Olfactory discrimination ability of CD-1 mice for aliphatic aldehydes as a function of stimulus concentration.

Authors:  Matthias Laska; Dipa Joshi; Gordon M Shepherd
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  OdorMapComparer: an application for quantitative analyses and comparisons of fMRI brain odor maps.

Authors:  Nian Liu; Fuqiang Xu; Perry L Miller; Gordon M Shepherd
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2007

6.  Olfactory discrimination of aliphatic odorants at 1 ppm: too easy for CD-1 mice to show odor structure-activity relationships?

Authors:  Matthias Laska; Asa Rosandher; Sara Hommen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Honeybees (Apis mellifera) learn to discriminate the smell of organic compounds from their respective deuterated isotopomers.

Authors:  Wulfila Gronenberg; Ajay Raikhelkar; Eric Abshire; Jennifer Stevens; Eric Epstein; Karin Loyola; Michael Rauscher; Stephen Buchmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Associative olfactory learning of honeybees to differential rewards in multiple contexts--effect of odor component and mixture similarity.

Authors:  Nitzan Paldi; Shirit Zilber; Sharoni Shafir
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Spontaneous versus reinforced olfactory discriminations.

Authors:  Christiane Linster; Brett A Johnson; Alix Morse; Esther Yue; Michael Leon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Gene expression analysis following olfactory learning in Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Zi-Long Wang; Huan Wang; Qiu-Hong Qin; Zhi-Jiang Zeng
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.