Literature DB >> 12173752

Subretinal implantation of semiconductor-based photodiodes: durability of novel implant designs.

Alan Y Chow1, Machelle T Pardue, Jay I Perlman, Sherry L Ball, Vincent Y Chow, John R Hetling, Gholam A Peyman, Chanping Liang, Evan B Stubbs, Neal S Peachey.   

Abstract

Selective degeneration of the retinal photoreceptor layers underlies blindness in retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and other inherited retinal disorders. Because there are no therapies for these patients, we are evaluating the possibility that electrical stimulation delivered to the subretinal space by a microphotodiode array (MPA) could replace, in some aspect, the function of diseased photoreceptors. Early MPA prototypes utilized gold as the electrode material, which gradually dissolved during the postoperative period following subretinal implantation. Here we present the results obtained when different MPA materials were used. Semiconductor-based silicon MPAs (2 mm in diameter; 50 microm in thickness), incorporating iridium/iridium oxide (IrOx) or platinum (Pt) electrodes, were implanted into the subretinal space of the right eye of normal cats with the use of vitreoretinal surgical techniques. Indirect ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, ganzfeld electroretinography, and histology were used for the evaluation of the implanted retinas postoperatively. Infrared (IR) stimulation was used to isolate electrical responses generated by the MPA. The unimplanted left eyes were used for control purposes. After the implantation surgery, subretinal MPAs retained a stable position in the subretinal space. Up to 12 months after surgery, there was little change in the magnitude of the electrical response of IrOx- and Pt-based MPAs to a standard IR light stimulus. Overlying the implant, there was a near-complete loss of the outer retinal layer, which is likely to reflect obstruction of choroidal nourishment to these layers by the solid disk implant. In addition, the inner retinal layers showed variable disorganization. Away from the implant, the retina displayed a normal appearance. In comparison to electroretinograms (ERGs) obtained from unimplanted eyes, responses recorded from implanted eyes had a normal waveform but were slightly smaller in amplitude. These results indicate that IrOx and Pt improve implant electrode durability and that implants incorporating these materials into the electrode layer do not induce panretinal abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12173752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  19 in total

1.  The value of preoperative tests in the selection of blind patients for a permanent microelectronic implant.

Authors:  Douglas Yanai; Rohit R Lakhanpal; James D Weiland; Manjunatha Mahadevappa; Gretchen Van Boemel; Gildo Y Fujii; Robert Greenberg; Sean Caffey; Eugene de Juan; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2003

2.  Subretinal electrode implantation in the P23H rat for chronic stimulations.

Authors:  J Salzmann; O P Linderholm; J-L Guyomard; M Paques; M Simonutti; M Lecchi; J Sommerhalder; E Dubus; M Pelizzone; D Bertrand; J Sahel; P Renaud; A B Safran; S Picaud
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  [Status of the subretinal implant project. An overview].

Authors:  F Gekeler; E Zrenner
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Implantation of mouse eyes with a subretinal microphotodiode array.

Authors:  Machelle T Pardue; Tiffany A Walker; Amanda E Faulkner; Moon K Kim; Christopher M Bonner; George Y McLean
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 5.  A review of in vivo animal studies in retinal prosthesis research.

Authors:  Dimiter R Bertschinger; Evgueny Beknazar; Manuel Simonutti; Avinoam B Safran; José A Sahel; Serge G Rosolen; Serge Picaud; Joel Salzmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Retinal expression of Fgf2 in RCS rats with subretinal microphotodiode array.

Authors:  Vincent T Ciavatta; Moon Kim; Paul Wong; John M Nickerson; R Keith Shuler; George Y McLean; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Neuroprotective dose response in RCS rats implanted with microphotodiode arrays.

Authors:  Machelle T Pardue; Moon K Kim; Tiffany A Walker; Amanda E Faulkner; Alan Y Chow; Vincent T Ciavatta
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  The artificial silicon retina in retinitis pigmentosa patients (an American Ophthalmological Association thesis).

Authors:  Alan Y Chow; Ava K Bittner; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2010-12

9.  Optical Techniques in Optogenetics.

Authors:  Samarendra K Mohanty; Vasudevan Lakshminarayananan
Journal:  J Mod Opt       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.464

10.  Biocompatibility of subretinal parylene-based Ti/Pt microelectrode array in rabbit for further artificial vision studies.

Authors:  Weihong Yu; Xuqian Wang; Chan Zhao; Zhikun Yang; Rongping Dai; Fangtian Dong
Journal:  J Ocul Biol Dis Infor       Date:  2009-03-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.