Literature DB >> 12163554

Electromyographic responses to an unexpected load in fast voluntary movements: descending regulation of segmental reflexes.

Mark B Shapiro1, Gerald L Gottlieb, Charity G Moore, Daniel M Corcos.   

Abstract

This study examined the effects of unexpected loading on muscle activation during fast goal-oriented movements. We tested the hypothesis that the electromyographic (EMG) response to an unexpected load occurs at a short latency after the difference between the expected and the unexpected movement velocity exceeds a fixed threshold. Subjects performed two movement tasks as follows: 1) 30 degrees fast elbow flexion movement with an inertial load added by a torque motor; and 2) 50 degrees fast elbow flexion movement with no added load. These movement tasks were chosen to have similar timing parameters, such as movement time, time-to-peak velocity, and duration of the first agonist burst, while the magnitudes of the angular displacement, velocity, and acceleration were different. In task 1, in random trials a viscous load was substituted for the inertial load at movement onset. In task 2, the same viscous load was added in random trials. The earliest consistent response to the unexpected load was detected in the agonist (biceps) EMG at the same time, about 200 ms from the EMG onset, in both tasks. However, the velocity errors were different in the two tasks and no velocity error threshold dependency could be found. Therefore we reject the hypothesis that the timing of the EMG response to an unexpected load is related to a velocity error threshold. Instead, we suggest that the timing of the EMG response is primarily determined by descending regulation of segmental reflex gain.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12163554     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2002.88.2.1059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  14 in total

1.  The neural control of single degree-of-freedom elbow movements. Effect of starting joint position.

Authors:  Janey Prodoehl; Gerald L Gottlieb; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Interlimb differences in control of movement extent.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Sydney Y Schaefer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Suppression of proprioceptive feedback control in movement sequences through intermediate targets.

Authors:  C Minos Niu; Daniel M Corcos; Mark B Shapiro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Absence of equifinality of hand position in a double-step unloading task.

Authors:  Nahid Norouzi-Gheidari; Philippe Archambault
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Error Detection is Critical for Visual-Motor Corrections.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Pratik K Mutha
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 1.422

6.  Load knowledge reduces rapid force production and muscle activation during maximal-effort concentric lifts.

Authors:  J L Hernández-Davó; R Sabido; M Moya-Ramón; A J Blazevich
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Differential influence of vision and proprioception on control of movement distance.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Interlimb transfer of load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Adaptation to a novel multi-force environment.

Authors:  Isaac Kurtzer; Paul A DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Proprioceptive feedback during point-to-point arm movements is tuned to the expected dynamics of the task.

Authors:  Mark B Shapiro; Chuanxin M Niu; Cynthia Poon; Fabian J David; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.