Literature DB >> 12145076

Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with laryngoscope versus lightwand intubating device (Trachlight) in adults with normal airway.

Shinji Takahashi1, Taro Mizutani, Masayuki Miyabe, Hidenori Toyooka.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Lightwand devices are effective and safe as an aid to tracheal intubation. Theoretically, avoiding direct-vision laryngoscopy could allow for less stimulation by intubation than the conventional laryngoscopic procedure. We designed this prospective randomized study to assess the cardiovascular changes after either lightwand or direct laryngoscopic tracheal intubation in adult patients anesthetized with sevoflurane. Sixty healthy adult patients with normal airways were randomly assigned to one of three groups according to intubating procedure under sevoflurane/nitrous oxide anesthesia (fraction of inspired oxygen = 0.33) (n = 20 each). The lightwand group received tracheal intubation with Trachlight, the laryngoscope-intubation group received tracheal intubation with a direct-vision laryngoscope (Macintosh blade), and the laryngoscopy-alone group received the laryngoscope alone. Heart rate and systolic blood pressure were recorded continuously for 5 min after tracheal intubation or laryngoscopy with enough time to intubate. All procedures were successful on the first attempt. The maximum heart rate and systolic blood pressure values obtained after intubation with Trachlight (114 +/- 20 bpm and 143 +/- 30 mm Hg, respectively) did not differ from those with the Macintosh laryngoscope (114 +/- 20 bpm and 138 +/- 23 mm Hg), but they were significantly larger than those in the laryngoscopy-alone group (94 +/- 19 bpm and 112 +/- 21 mm Hg) (P < 0.05). Direct stimulation of the trachea appears to be a major cause of the hemodynamic changes associated with tracheal intubation. IMPLICATIONS: The magnitude of hemodynamic changes associated with tracheal intubation with the Trachlight is almost the same as that which occurs with the direct laryngoscope. Hemodynamic changes are likely to occur because of direct tracheal irritation rather than direct stimulation of the larynx.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12145076     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200208000-00046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  21 in total

1.  Effect of laryngoscopy on middle ear pressure during anaesthesia induction.

Authors:  Semih Degerli; Baran Acar; Mehmet Sahap; Eyup Horasanlı
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2013-09-25

2.  Comparison of effect-site concentration of remifentanil for tracheal intubation with the lightwand and laryngoscopy during propofol target-controlled infusion.

Authors:  Jin-Soo Kim; Dae-Hee Kim; Sang-Kee Min; Kyung-Mi Kim; Jong-Yeop Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-06-17

3.  Haemodynamic response at double lumen bronchial tube placement - Airtraq vs. MacIntosh laryngoscope, a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas Hamp; Thomas Stumpner; Georg Grubhofer; Kurt Ruetzler; Rainer Thell; Helmut Hager
Journal:  Heart Lung Vessel       Date:  2015

4.  Influence of GlideScope assisted endotracheal intubation on intraocular pressure in ophthalmic patients.

Authors:  Nauman Ahmad; Abdul Zahoor; Waleed Riad; Saeed Al Motowa
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

5.  Comparison of the Airtraq laryngoscope and the GlideScope for double-lumen tube intubation in patients with predicted normal airways: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Jie Yi; Yahong Gong; Xiang Quan; Yuguang Huang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Comparison of hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation with the GlideScope video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.

Authors:  Gökhan İnangil; Kadir Hakan Cansız; Fuat Gürbüz; Ömer Bakal; Fatma Merih Gökben; Hüseyin Şen
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 0.332

7.  Haemodynamic Response to Four Different Laryngoscopes.

Authors:  Demet Altun; Achmet Ali; Emre Çamcı; Anıl Özonur; Tülay Özkan Seyhan
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-09-06

8.  A comparison of hemodynamic changes after endotracheal intubation by the Optiscope™ and the conventional laryngoscope.

Authors:  Duk-Dong Ko; Hyun Kang; So-Young Yang; Hwa-Yong Shin; Chong Wha Baek; Yong Hun Jung; Young-Cheol Woo; Jin-Yun Kim; Gill Hoi Koo; Seong-Deok Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-08-14

9.  Comparison of haemodynamic responses to intubation: Flexible fibreoptic bronchoscope versus bonfils rigid intubation endoscope.

Authors:  Kapil Gupta; Kiran Kumar Girdhar; Raktima Anand; Sumanth Mallikarjuna Majgi; Surinder Pal Gupta; Payal Bansal Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2012-07

10.  Effect of tracheal lidocaine on intubating conditions during propofol-remifentanil target-controlled infusion without neuromuscular blockade in day-case anesthesia.

Authors:  Jin-Soo Kim; Dae-Hee Kim; Han Bum Joe; Chang Keun Oh; Jong-Yeop Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.