Literature DB >> 30505605

Haemodynamic Response to Four Different Laryngoscopes.

Demet Altun1, Achmet Ali1, Emre Çamcı1, Anıl Özonur1, Tülay Özkan Seyhan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this prospective randomized study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of tracheal intubation with four different laryngoscopes [Macintosh direct laryngoscope-classic laryngoscope (CL), McCoy (MC), C-Mac video-laryngoscope (CM) and McGrath video-laryngoscope (MG)] on haemodynamic responses in patients with a normal airway.
METHODS: One hundred and sixty patients were included. Succeeding haemodynamic measurements were performed immediately after intubation (T2) and for 5 min with 1-min intervals (T3-T4-T5-T6-T7). The primary outcome was the heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) change triggered by the four different laryngoscopes. The intubation time, the number of intubation attempts, need for stylet or additional manipulation, glottic view and traumatic complications caused by intubation procedure were recorded as secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: HR values significantly increased with the completion of laryngoscopy and intubation at T2 for the CL, MC and CM groups. Lesser fluctuation in HR and SBP was observed in the MG group. Intubation time was significantly shorter in the MG group (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the number of intubation attempts, need for stylette and glottic view. Fewer patients in the MG and CM groups experienced a moderate and severe sore throat than in the other two groups. Shorter intubation time and lesser sore throat incidence were observed in the MG group.
CONCLUSION: MG offers less haemodynamic stimulation than CL, MC, and CM. Our findings showed that tracheal intubation with MG is advantageous in preventing cardiovascular stress responses with short intubation time and less sore throat incidence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Haemodynamic response; laryngoscope; tracheal intubation

Year:  2018        PMID: 30505605      PMCID: PMC6223868          DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2018.59265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim        ISSN: 2149-276X


  16 in total

1.  Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with laryngoscope versus lightwand intubating device (Trachlight) in adults with normal airway.

Authors:  Shinji Takahashi; Taro Mizutani; Masayuki Miyabe; Hidenori Toyooka
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Opioid sparing during endotracheal intubation using McCoy laryngoscope in neurosurgical patients: the comparison of haemodynamic changes with Macintosh blade in a randomized trial.

Authors:  Prabhat Tewari; D Gupta; A Kumar; U Singh
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.476

3.  Skin vasomotor reflex induced by laryngoscopy: comparison of the McCoy and Macintosh blades.

Authors:  O Shimoda; Y Ikuta; S Isayama; M Sakamoto; H Terasaki
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Circulatory changes during direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: influence of duration of laryngoscopy with or without prior lidocaine.

Authors:  R K Stoelting
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Complications related to the pressor response to endotracheal intubation.

Authors:  E J Fox; G S Sklar; C H Hill; R Villanueva; B D King
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Plasma catecholamine responses to tracheal intubation.

Authors:  D R Derbyshire; A Chmielewski; D Fell; M Vater; K Achola; G Smith
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Comparison of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope.

Authors:  Fu S Xue; Guo H Zhang; Xuan Y Li; Hai T Sun; Ping Li; Cheng W Li; Kun P Liu
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 9.452

8.  Comparison of hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation with Truview PCD™, McGrath® and Macintosh laryngoscope in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Deepak K Tempe; Kapil Chaudhary; Anitha Diwakar; Vishnu Datt; Sanjula Virmani; Akhlesh S Tomar; Anoop Mohandas; Vishwanath Bharav Mohire
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

9.  Comparing McGRATH® MAC, C-MAC®, and Macintosh Laryngoscopes Operated by Medical Students: A Randomized, Crossover, Manikin Study.

Authors:  Myungju Shin; Sun Joon Bai; Ki-Young Lee; Ein Oh; Hyun Joo Kim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Comparison of hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation with Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes.

Authors:  Mehtab A Haidry; Fauzia A Khan
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Jan Hansel; Andrew M Rogers; Sharon R Lewis; Tim M Cook; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-04

2.  Comparison of direct laryngoscope and McGrath videolaryngoscope in terms of glottic view and hemodynamics in bariatric surgery

Authors:  Mehmet Çakir; Erhan Özyurt
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 2.925

Review 3.  Video screen visualization patterns when using a video laryngoscope for tracheal intubation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Preston Dean; Benjamin Kerrey
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-01-06

4.  Split Type Postman videolaryngoscope: The newer device versus the standard Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated difficult airway - A new hope for difficult intubation scenarios.

Authors:  N S Nisanth; Qazi E Ali; Syed H Amir
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2022-03-24

5.  Tracheal intubation with the McGrath MAC X-blade videolaryngoscope in morbidly obese and nonobese patients

Authors:  Zehra İpek Arslan; Hadi Ufuk Yörükoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 0.973

6.  Utility of a Modified Oropharyngeal Airway for Performing Tracheal Intubation Using a Fiberoptic Bronchoscope and Video Stylet: A Randomized Crossover Trial Using a Manikin.

Authors:  Jang Hee Lee; Ji Ung Na; Dong Hyuk Shin; Pil Cho Choi; Sang O Park; Won Jae Kim; Sang Kuk Han
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 1.112

7.  Evaluation of lightwand-guided endotracheal intubation for patients with missing or no teeth: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Ge; Wei Liu; Ziting Zhang; Fenglei Xie; Tengfei Zhao; Yuanhai Li
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-04-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.