Literature DB >> 17522929

Evaluation of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones in a prospective series of 505 patients: indications and results.

J Ch Berthou1, B Dron, Ph Charbonneau, K Moussalier, L Pellissier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was the evaluation of the laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS) and its indications.
METHODS: Five hundred five patients who underwent laparoscopic treatment of CBDS from October 1990 to September 2006 were included in the prospective study. The mean age of the patients was 63 years (range = 19-93). Four hundred fifteen patients were classified ASA I and ASA II and 90 were ASA III and ASA IV. CBDS were suspected or diagnosed preoperatively in 373 patients (73.8%) and diagnosed at intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) in 132 patients (26.2%). A transcystic duct extraction (TCDE) was attempted in 254 patients (50.4%) and a primary choledochotomy in 251 patients (49.6%). Biliary drainage after choledochotomy was used in 148 cases (48.8%).
RESULTS: TCDE was successful in 191 cases (75.2%). The 63 failures were managed by laparoscopic choledochotomy in 53 cases and by endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) in 10 cases. A choledochotomy was thus performed in 304 patients and successful in 295 cases (97%). The nine failures were managed by six conversions to laparotomy (2%) and three postoperative ES. The overall success rate was 96.2%. The morbidity rate was 7.9% with 4.8% of local complications and 3.1% of general complications. The mortality rate was 1%. There were 14 residual stones (2.8%) that were managed by a second laparoscopy in two cases and by ES in 12 cases with four failures managed by laparotomy in one case and laparoscopy in three cases.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic management of CBDS was effective in more than 96% of cases and particularly safe in ASA I and ASA II patients. It has the advantage over ES followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LS) to be a one-stage procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17522929     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9387-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  33 in total

1.  Effectiveness and long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  R Riciardi; S Islam; J J Canete; P L Arcand; M E Stoker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  S Ebner; J Rechner; S Beller; K Erhart; F M Riegler; G Szinicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus endoscopic stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis. A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  G Sgourakis; K Karaliotas
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  M Rhodes; L Sussman; L Cohen; M P Lewis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-17       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration are safe for older patients.

Authors:  A M Paganini; F Feliciotti; M Guerrieri; A Tamburini; R Campagnacci; E Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic trans-cystic-duct common-bile-duct exploration.

Authors:  E H Phillips; R J Rosenthal; B J Carroll; M J Fallas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Long-term results from laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  A Waage; C Strömberg; C-E Leijonmarck; D Arvidsson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: transcystic approach and choledochotomy.

Authors:  Hiromi Tokumura; Akiko Umezawa; Hui Cao; Nobuhide Sakamoto; Yoichi Imaoka; Akio Ouchi; Kyoji Yamamoto
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2002

9.  All-comers policy for laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  M H Thompson; S E Tranter
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage following exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  J A Williams; P J Treacy; P Sidey; C S Worthley; N C Townsend; E A Russell
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1994-12
View more
  28 in total

1.  Is the use of T-tube necessary after laparoscopic choledochotomy?

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel-Raouf El-Geidie
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Comparison between intraoperative cholangiography and choledochoscopy for ductal clearance in laparoscopic CBD exploration: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Anubhav Vindal; Jagdish Chander; Pawanindra Lal; Balu Mahendra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Simultaneous laparoendoscopic rendezvous for the treatment of cholecystocholedocholithiasis.

Authors:  Gaetano La Greca; Francesco Barbagallo; Maria Sofia; Saverio Latteri; Domenico Russello
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Surgery for common bile duct stones--a lost surgical skill; still worthwhile in the minimally invasive century?

Authors:  Harald Puhalla; Nathan Flint; Nicholas O'Rourke
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  Preoperative versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones: system review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Zhenying Guo; Zhenjie Liu; Yuan Wang; Yi Si; Yuefeng Zhu; Mingjuan Jin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Routine use of simultaneous laparoendoscopic approach in patients with confirmed gallbladder and bile duct stones: fit for laparoscopy fit for "rendezvous".

Authors:  Cinzia Tommasi; Lapo Bencini; Marco Bernini; Riccardo Naspetti; Giulia Cavallina; Roberto Manetti; Luca Talamucci; Marco Farsi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Synchronous vs sequential laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis.

Authors:  Yan-Bing Ding; Bin Deng; Xin-Nong Liu; Jian Wu; Wei-Ming Xiao; Yuan-Zhi Wang; Jian-Ming Ma; Qiang Li; Ze-Sheng Ju
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Modern approach to cholecysto-choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Lapo Bencini; Cinzia Tommasi; Roberto Manetti; Marco Farsi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-02-16

9.  An audit of short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic removal of common bile duct stones in Finland.

Authors:  Anne Mattila; Jussi Luhtala; Johanna Mrena; Hannu Kautiainen; Ilmo Kellokumpu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  A decade of washing out common bile duct stones with papillary balloon dilatation as a one-stage procedure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A E B Sjer; D M Boland; P J J van Rijn; S Mohamad
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.