Literature DB >> 12101875

Uses of evidence in disability outcomes and effectiveness research.

Alan M Jette1, Julie J Keysor.   

Abstract

Outcomes and effectiveness research is a category of health services research that gauges how well the health care needs of persons with disabilities are being met. Using Patrick's Model of Health Promotion for people with disabilities as a framework for analysis, this article examines outcomes and effectiveness research related to the health care needs of persons with disabilities. The three most pressing research priorities are clear theoretical conceptualizations and qualitative research on health outcomes relevant to the needs of persons with disabilities; a systemic analysis of existing assessment instruments' utility for disability outcomes research; and the development and testing of new outcome instruments.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2002        PMID： 12101875      PMCID： PMC2690106          DOI： 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Milbank Q        ISSN： 0887-378X            Impact factor:   4.911


  47 in total

1.  Limitations of the SF-36 in a sample of nursing home residents.

Authors:  E M Andresen; G W Gravitt; M E Aydelotte; C A Podgorski
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.668

2.  Better health care decisions: fulfilling the promise of health services research.

Authors:  J Hadley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Defining quality of care.

Authors:  S M Campbell; M O Roland; S A Buetow
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  A discussion of item response theory and its applications in health status assessment.

Authors:  D Cella; C H Chang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Assessment of the evaluative properties of health status instruments.

Authors:  P Erickson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: a brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales.

Authors:  J E Ware; J B Bjorner; M Kosinski
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century.

Authors:  R D Hays; L S Morales; S P Reise
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Emergence of item response modeling in instrument development and data analysis.

Authors:  R K Hambleton
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Equating health status measures with item response theory: illustrations with functional status items.

Authors:  C A McHorney; A S Cohen
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Measuring what works in health care.

Authors:  C Anderson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-02-25       Impact factor: 47.728
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Meeting the health care needs of persons with disabilities.

Authors:  Carolyn M Clancy; Elena M Andresen
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Relationships between health domains and sense of coherence: a two-year cross-lagged study in patients with chronic illness.

Authors:  Marijke Veenstra; Torbjørn Moum; Espen Røysamb
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Effects of payment changes on trends in post-acute care.

Authors:  Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin; Carrie Hoverman Colla; José J Escarce
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Towards guidelines for evaluation of measures: an introduction with application to spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Mark V Johnston; Daniel E Graves
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Activity Limitation Stages empirically derived for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental ADL in the U.S. Adult community-dwelling Medicare population.

Authors:  Margaret G Stineman; Joel E Streim; Qiang Pan; Jibby E Kurichi; Sophia Miryam Schüssler-Fiorenza Rose; Dawei Xie
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Evidence of validity for the Japanese version of the foot and ankle ability measure.

Authors:  Daisuke Uematsu; Hidetomo Suzuki; Shogo Sasaki; Yasuharu Nagano; Nobuyuki Shinozuka; Norihiko Sunagawa; Toru Fukubayashi
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Longitudinal invariance and construct validity of the abbreviated late-life function and disability instrument in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Amanda N Szabo; Sean P Mullen; Siobhan M White; Thomas R Wojcicki; Emily L Mailey; Neha Gothe; Erin A Olson; Jason Fanning; Arthur F Kramer; Edward McAuley
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  The Camberwell Assessment of Need and Behaviour and Symptom Identification Scale as routine outcome measures in a psychiatric disability rehabilitation and support service.

Authors:  Tom Trauer; Glen Tobias
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2004-06

9.  Mobility limitations negatively impact work outcomes among Medicaid enrollees with disabilities.

Authors:  Alexis D Henry; Steven Banks; Robin Clark; Jay Himmelstein
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-06-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.