Literature DB >> 10982095

Assessment of the evaluative properties of health status instruments.

P Erickson1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2000        PMID： 10982095     DOI： 10.1097/00005650-200009002-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN： 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation.

Authors:  C B Terwee; F W Dekker; W M Wiersinga; M F Prummel; P M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Health status and health dynamics in an empirical model of expected longevity.

Authors:  Hugo Benítez-Silva; Huan Ni
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  In prospective study using Specific Quality of Life & Outcomes Response-Venous (SQOR-V) questionnaire the recall bias had the same magnitude as the minimally important difference.

Authors:  Fedor Lurie; Robert L Kistner
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Responsiveness of the coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire compared with the SF-36 and Seattle Angina Questionnaire.

Authors:  Sara Schroter; Donna L Lamping
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Uses of evidence in disability outcomes and effectiveness research.

Authors:  Alan M Jette; Julie J Keysor
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.911
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.