Literature DB >> 21458777

Longitudinal invariance and construct validity of the abbreviated late-life function and disability instrument in healthy older adults.

Amanda N Szabo1, Sean P Mullen, Siobhan M White, Thomas R Wojcicki, Emily L Mailey, Neha Gothe, Erin A Olson, Jason Fanning, Arthur F Kramer, Edward McAuley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To cross-validate the psychometric properties of the abbreviated Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LL-FDI), a measure of perceived functional limitations and disability.
DESIGN: Baseline and 12-month follow-up assessments conducted across the course of a 12-month exercise program.
SETTING: University research community. PARTICIPANTS: Older healthy adults (N=179; mean ± SD age, 66.43±5.67y) at baseline; 145 were retained at follow-up.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: LL-FDI and functional performance measures.
RESULTS: Factor analyses confirmed the factor structure of the abbreviated LL-FDI, and all subscales met minimal criteria for temporal invariance. Significant correlations also were found between functional limitations subscales and an array of physical function performance measures, supporting the scale's construct validity.
CONCLUSIONS: The abbreviated LL-FDI with some modifications appears to be temporally invariant in community-dwelling older adults. Additionally, moderate relationships between functional limitations and functional performance provide further support for these being conceptually distinct constructs.
Copyright © 2011 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21458777      PMCID: PMC3772086          DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.12.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  24 in total

1.  Late Life Function and Disability Instrument: II. Development and evaluation of the function component.

Authors:  Stephen M Haley; Alan M Jette; Wendy J Coster; Jill T Kooyoomjian; Suzette Levenson; Tim Heeren; Jacqueline Ashba
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  Latent Growth Models of Individual Change: The Case of Newcomer Adjustment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  2000-09

3.  Conceptual challenges in linking physical activity and disability research.

Authors:  Anita L Stewart
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Confirmatory factor analysis: an introduction for psychosomatic medicine researchers.

Authors:  Michael A Babyak; Samuel B Green
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.312

5.  Resistance training and detraining effects on flexibility performance in the elderly are intensity-dependent.

Authors:  Ioannis G Fatouros; Antonios Kambas; Ioannis Katrabasas; Diamanda Leontsini; Athanasios Chatzinikolaou; Athanasios Z Jamurtas; Ioannis Douroudos; Nikolaos Aggelousis; Kiriakos Taxildaris
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  An epidemiology of disability among adults in the United States.

Authors:  S Z Nagi
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc       Date:  1976

7.  Effects of resistance- and flexibility-exercise interventions on balance and related measures in older adults.

Authors:  Marie-Louise Bird; Keith Hill; Madeleine Ball; Andrew D Williams
Journal:  J Aging Phys Act       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.961

8.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Measuring patients' views: the optimum outcome measure.

Authors:  J E Ware
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-29

10.  Measuring higher level physical function in well-functioning older adults: expanding familiar approaches in the Health ABC study.

Authors:  E M Simonsick; A B Newman; M C Nevitt; S B Kritchevsky; L Ferrucci; J M Guralnik; T Harris
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.053

View more
  1 in total

1.  Does the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS) measure anxiety symptoms consistently across adolescence? The TRAILS study.

Authors:  Christina M Mathyssek; Thomas M Olino; Catharina A Hartman; Johan Ormel; Frank C Verhulst; Floor V A Van Oort
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 4.035

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.