Literature DB >> 21030746

Effects of frequency- and direction-dependent elastic materials on linearly elastic MRE image reconstructions.

I M Perreard1, A J Pattison, M Doyley, M D J McGarry, Z Barani, E E Van Houten, J B Weaver, K D Paulsen.   

Abstract

The mechanical model commonly used in magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is linear elasticity. However, soft tissue may exhibit frequency- and direction-dependent (FDD) shear moduli in response to an induced excitation causing a purely linear elastic model to provide an inaccurate image reconstruction of its mechanical properties. The goal of this study was to characterize the effects of reconstructing FDD data using a linear elastic inversion (LEI) algorithm. Linear and FDD phantoms were manufactured and LEI images were obtained from time-harmonic MRE acquisitions with variations in frequency and driving signal amplitude. LEI responses to artificially imposed uniform phase shifts in the displacement data from both purely linear elastic and FDD phantoms were also evaluated. Of the variety of FDD phantoms considered, LEI appeared to tolerate viscoelastic data-model mismatch better than deviations caused by poroelastic and anisotropic mechanical properties in terms of visual image contrast. However, the estimated shear modulus values were substantially incorrect relative to independent mechanical measurements even in the successful viscoelastic cases and the variations in mean values with changes in experimental conditions associated with uniform phase shifts, driving signal frequency and amplitude were unpredictable. Overall, use of LEI to reconstruct data acquired in phantoms with FDD material properties provided biased results under the best conditions and significant artifacts in the worst cases. These findings suggest that the success with which LEI is applied to MRE data in tissue will depend on the underlying mechanical characteristics of the tissues and/or organs systems of clinical interest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21030746      PMCID: PMC3776577          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/22/013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  38 in total

1.  Three-dimensional subzone-based reconstruction algorithm for MR elastography.

Authors:  E E Van Houten; M I Miga; J B Weaver; F E Kennedy; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Shear creep of gelatin gels from mammalian and piscine collagens.

Authors:  P M Gilsenan; S B Ross-Murphy
Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol       Date:  2001-07-19       Impact factor: 6.953

3.  Tissue-mimicking oil-in-gelatin dispersions for use in heterogeneous elastography phantoms.

Authors:  E L Madsen; G R Frank; T A Krouskop; T Varghese; F Kallel; J Ophir
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.578

4.  Thresholds for detecting and characterizing focal lesions using steady-state MR elastography.

Authors:  Marvin M Doyley; John B Weaver; Elijah E W Van Houten; Francis E Kennedy; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Initial in vivo experience with steady-state subzone-based MR elastography of the human breast.

Authors:  Elijah E W Van Houten; Marvin M Doyley; Francis E Kennedy; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Comparison of quantitative shear wave MR-elastography with mechanical compression tests.

Authors:  U Hamhaber; F A Grieshaber; J H Nagel; U Klose
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  The performance of steady-state harmonic magnetic resonance elastography when applied to viscoelastic materials.

Authors:  Marvin M Doyley; Irina Perreard; Adam J Patterson; John B Weaver; Keith M Paulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  MR elastography of breast cancer: preliminary results.

Authors:  Alexia L McKnight; Jennifer L Kugel; Phillip J Rossman; Armando Manduca; Lynn C Hartmann; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity.

Authors:  A Manduca; T E Oliphant; M A Dresner; J L Mahowald; S A Kruse; E Amromin; J P Felmlee; J F Greenleaf; R L Ehman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.545

10.  MR elastography of the breast:preliminary clinical results.

Authors:  J Lorenzen; R Sinkus; M Lorenzen; M Dargatz; C Leussler; P Röschmann; G Adam
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2002-07
View more
  9 in total

1.  Gradient-Based Optimization for Poroelastic and Viscoelastic MR Elastography.

Authors:  Likun Tan; Matthew D J McGarry; Elijah E W Van Houten; Ming Ji; Ligin Solamen; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Viscoelastic properties of soft gels: comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and dynamic shear testing in the shear wave regime.

Authors:  R J Okamoto; E H Clayton; P V Bayly
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Model-based elastography: a survey of approaches to the inverse elasticity problem.

Authors:  M M Doyley
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Quantitative imaging methods for the development and validation of brain biomechanics models.

Authors:  Philip V Bayly; Erik H Clayton; Guy M Genin
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 9.590

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in cancer: Technique, analysis, and applications.

Authors:  Kay M Pepin; Richard L Ehman; Kiaran P McGee
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 9.795

6.  Observation of direction-dependent mechanical properties in the human brain with multi-excitation MR elastography.

Authors:  Aaron T Anderson; Elijah E W Van Houten; Matthew D J McGarry; Keith D Paulsen; Joseph L Holtrop; Bradley P Sutton; John G Georgiadis; Curtis L Johnson
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2016-03-18

7.  Local mechanical properties of white matter structures in the human brain.

Authors:  Curtis L Johnson; Matthew D J McGarry; Armen A Gharibans; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen; Huan Wang; William C Olivero; Bradley P Sutton; John G Georgiadis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Quantitative 3D magnetic resonance elastography: Comparison with dynamic mechanical analysis.

Authors:  Shivaram P Arunachalam; Phillip J Rossman; Arvin Arani; David S Lake; Kevin J Glaser; Joshua D Trzasko; Armando Manduca; Kiaran P McGee; Richard L Ehman; Philip A Araoz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 9.  Stiffness reconstruction methods for MR elastography.

Authors:  Daniel Fovargue; David Nordsletten; Ralph Sinkus
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 4.044

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.