Literature DB >> 23846344

Consumer preferences for the predictive genetic test for Alzheimer disease.

Ming-Yi Huang1, Sally A Huston, Matthew Perri.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess consumer preferences for predictive genetic testing for Alzheimer disease in the United States. A rating conjoint analysis was conducted using an anonymous online survey distributed by Qualtrics to a general population panel in April 2011 in the United States. The study design included three attributes: Accuracy (40%, 80%, and 100%), Treatment Availability (Cure is available/Drug for symptom relief but no cure), and Anonymity (Anonymous/Not anonymous). A total of 12 scenarios were used to elicit people's preference, assessed by an 11-point scale. The respondents also indicated their highest willingness-to-pay (WTP) for each scenario through open-ended questions. A total of 295 responses were collected over 4 days. The most important attribute for the aggregate model was Accuracy, contributing 64.73% to the preference rating. Treatment Availability and Anonymity contributed 20.72% and 14.59%, respectively, to the preference rating. The median WTP for the highest-rating scenario (Accuracy 100%, a cure is available, test result is anonymous) was $100 (mean = $276). The median WTP for the lowest-rating scenario (40% accuracy, no cure but drugs for symptom relief, not anonymous) was zero (mean = $34). The results of this study highlight attributes people find important when making the hypothetical decision to obtain an AD genetic test. These results should be of interests to policy makers, genetic test developers and health care providers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23846344     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9627-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  13 in total

1.  Public attitudes about genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  P J Neumann; J K Hammitt; C Mueller; H M Fillit; J Hill; N A Tetteh; K S Kosik
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 2.  The dementias.

Authors:  Karen Ritchie; Simon Lovestone
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Genetic testing: psychological aspects and implications.

Authors:  Caryn Lerman; Robert T Croyle; Kenneth P Tercyak; Heidi Hamann
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2002-06

4.  Early detection of Alzheimer disease: methods, markers, and misgivings.

Authors:  R C Green; V C Clarke; N J Thompson; J L Woodard; R Letz
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.703

5.  Conjoint analysis: using a market-based research model for healthcare decision making.

Authors:  Nancy L Mele
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Deaths: final data for 2008.

Authors:  Arialdi M Miniño; Sherry L Murphy; Jiaquan Xu; Kenneth D Kochanek
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2011-12-07

7.  Anticipating response to predictive genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease: a survey of first-degree relatives.

Authors:  J S Roberts
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2000-02

8.  Genetic susceptibility testing for Alzheimer disease: motivation to obtain information and control as precursors to coping with increased risk.

Authors:  Holly C Gooding; Erin L Linnenbringer; Jeffrey Burack; J Scott Roberts; Robert C Green; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-07-21

9.  Genetic counseling and testing for Alzheimer disease: joint practice guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Jill S Goldman; Susan E Hahn; Jennifer Williamson Catania; Susan LaRusse-Eckert; Melissa Barber Butson; Malia Rumbaugh; Michelle N Strecker; J Scott Roberts; Wylie Burke; Richard Mayeux; Thomas Bird
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Physicians' propensity to offer genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease: results from a survey.

Authors:  Gary A Chase; Gail Geller; Suzanne L Havstad; Neil A Holtzman; Susan Spear Bassett
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  8 in total

1.  Mechanisms Behind Religiosity and Spirituality's Effect on Mental Health, Quality of Life and Well-Being.

Authors:  Mario Fernando Prieto Peres; Helder H Kamei; Patricia R Tobo; Giancarlo Lucchetti
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2018-10

2.  Clinical implications of APOE genotyping for late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) risk estimation: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Victoria S Marshe; Ilona Gorbovskaya; Sarah Kanji; Maxine Kish; Daniel J Müller
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Preferences for genetic testing for colorectal cancer within a population-based screening program: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Jorien Veldwijk; Mattijs S Lambooij; Frank G J Kallenberg; Henk J van Kranen; Annelien L Bredenoord; Evelien Dekker; Henriëtte A Smit; G Ardine de Wit
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis on Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Semra Ozdemir; Jia Jia Lee; Isha Chaudhry; Remee Rose Quintana Ocampo
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Preventive drugs for Huntington's disease: A choice-based conjoint survey of patient preferences.

Authors:  Marcus C Parrish; Andrea Hanson-Kahn; V Srinivasan; Kevin V Grimes
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2022-03-01

6.  Increased Length of Awareness of Assisted Reproductive Technologies Fosters Positive Attitudes and Acceptance among Women.

Authors:  Chelsea Fortin; Susanne Abele
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-12-23

7.  Speaking up about care concerns in the ICU: patient and family experiences, attitudes and perceived barriers.

Authors:  Sigall K Bell; Stephanie D Roche; Ariel Mueller; Erica Dente; Kristin O'Reilly; Barbara Sarnoff Lee; Kenneth Sands; Daniel Talmor; Samuel M Brown
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 8.  Mental health service preferences of patients and providers: a scoping review of conjoint analysis and discrete choice experiments from global public health literature over the last 20 years (1999-2019).

Authors:  Anna Larsen; Albert Tele; Manasi Kumar
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.