Literature DB >> 24972541

The quality of snoring treatment information on the internet.

Vik Veer1, Glen Alder, Umesh Ullal.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the quality of information available on the World Wide Web regarding the treatment of snoring. The main data source was from internet searches using the three most popular search engines using the keywords "snoring treatment". First page websites were evaluated using the DISCERN instrument (assessing reliability and information given about treatment choices). Of the 135 websites identified, 16 unique websites were evaluated in the study (the remaining being adverts or repetitions). The websites had an average overall score of 2.37 out of 5 (range 1.19-4) and 37.5 % of the websites evaluated scored less than 2 out of 5 overall, suggesting very poor quality information. Highly ranked websites on popular search engines may not contain the most reliable information. Overall the information on the internet regarding the treatment of snoring is poor and patients should be encouraged to discuss their findings with a medical professional.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24972541     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3153-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  14 in total

1.  Invalid health information is potentially lethal.

Authors:  I Chalmers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-21

Review 2.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach; John Powell; Oliver Kuss; Eun-Ryoung Sa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Evaluating the reliability and validity of three tools to assess the quality of health information on the Internet.

Authors:  Gbogboade Ademiluyi; Charlotte E Rees; Charlotte E Sheard
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2003-06

4.  Accuracy of internet recommendations for prehospital care of venomous snake bites.

Authors:  Sarah Barker; Nathan P Charlton; Christopher P Holstege
Journal:  Wilderness Environ Med       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 1.518

5.  Help seeking behavior and the Internet: a national survey.

Authors:  Michele L Ybarra; Michael Suman
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  Surveys of physicians and electronic health information.

Authors:  Bradford W Hesse; Richard P Moser; Lila J Rutten
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Internet sees growth of unverified health claims.

Authors:  H Bower
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-17

8.  How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews.

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach; Christian Köhler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-09

Review 9.  Impact of internet use on health-related behaviors and the patient-physician relationship: a survey-based study and review.

Authors:  Suzy A Iverson; Kristin B Howard; Brian K Penney
Journal:  J Am Osteopath Assoc       Date:  2008-12

10.  Evaluating the reliability of DISCERN: a tool for assessing the quality of written patient information on treatment choices.

Authors:  Charlotte E Rees; Jillyan E Ford; Charlotte E Sheard
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2002-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  The Content and Quality of Health Information on the Internet for Patients and Families on Adult Kidney Cancer.

Authors:  Ahmed Alsaiari; Abdulaziz Joury; Mossab Aljuaid; Mohammed Wazzan; Jesse M Pines
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.

Authors:  Michel R M San Giorgi; Olivier S D de Groot; Frederik G Dikkers
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.325

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.