Literature DB >> 23223925

[Application of new speech intelligibility tests in silence for the assessment of acquired hearing losses].

H Sukowski1, K C Wagener, C Thiele, S Uppenkamp, B Kollmeier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies comparing the Freiburg speech tests (FST) currently used in Germany to assess the severity of hearing loss with two modern speech intelligibility tests [the Göttingen sentence test (GöSa) and the monosyllabic rhyme test devised by von Wallenberg and Kollmeier (WaKo)] have indicated that a replacement of the old procedure would be possible. The current study investigates the consequences of the modern test procedures for the estimation of reduction in earning capacity resulting from hearing loss, and considers the optimal presentation levels for the WaKo test.
METHODS: The FST, GöSa, and WaKo speech intelligibility tests were performed on 29 volunteers with a hearing impairment. All tests were conducted in silence. The presentation levels for the Freiburg monosyllabic test were 60, 80, and for some participants also 100 dB SPL. The WaKo test was carried out once at 45, 65, and 85 dB SPL (a reduction of 15 dB relative to the FST) and again at 40, 60 and 80 dB SPL (reduction of 20 dB relative to the FST).
RESULTS: A consideration across all presentation levels revealed that the best correlation match between the two monosyllabic tests was achieved at a 20-dB reduction in presentation level for the WaKo test relative to the FST. On average, the application of modern procedures and the different options for level reduction had only a minor effect on the quantitative assessment of reduction in earning capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23223925     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-012-2621-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  9 in total

1.  [Underestimation of minor noise-induced hearing loss].

Authors:  H Pawlata
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests.

Authors:  Thomas Brand; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  [Speech audiometry and new word-tests].

Authors:  K H HAHLBROCK
Journal:  Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd       Date:  1953

4.  [Comparison of the Göttingen sentence test and the monosyllabic rhyme test by von Wallenberg and Kollmeier with the Freiburg speech test : Investigation in a clinically representative group of listeners].

Authors:  H Sukowski; T Brand; K C Wagener; B Kollmeier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [Hearing loss determination and assessment of the reduction in earning capacity taking speech discrimination tests in noise into account].

Authors:  C Thiele; H Sukowski; K Wagener; B Kollmeier; T Lenarz; A Lesinski-Schiedat
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  [Comparison of different speech intelligibility tests in German language (Freiburg speech test vs. Göttingen sentence test and monosyllabic rhyme test)].

Authors:  H Sukowski; T Brand; K C Wagener; B Kollmeier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment.

Authors:  B Kollmeier; M Wesselkamp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  [New tables for the determination of percentile loss of speech hearing].

Authors:  H G Boenninghaus; D Röser
Journal:  Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol       Date:  1973-03

9.  [Indication for and verification of hearing aid benefit using modern methods of speech audiometry in German].

Authors:  B Kollmeier; T Lenarz; A Winkler; M A Zokoll; H Sukowski; T Brand; K C Wagener
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.284

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  [Does modern speech audiometry belong in the assessment process?].

Authors:  R Probst
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Speech audiometry in expert assessment of hearing impairment].

Authors:  C Batsoulis; A Lesinski-Schiedat
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.284

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.