H Ortiz1, P Armendariz, M DeMiguel, M D Ruiz, R Alós, J V Roig. 1. Units of Coloproctology, Departments of Surgery, Hospital Virgen del Camino, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. HHORTIZ@teleline.es
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The postoperative complications and functional outcome following 24 consecutive implantations of an artificial anal sphincter were assessed prospectively. METHODS: A total of 24 artificial anal sphincters (Acticon Neosphincter) were implanted in 22 patients (mean age 47 years). The mean follow-up period was 28 (range 6-48) months. Results were assessed prospectively by two independent observers at 4-month intervals. The cumulative probability of artificial anal sphincter removal was analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Five patients were free of complications. During the postoperative period, complications occurred in nine patients, two of whom required reoperation. During follow-up, complications developed in ten patients, nine of whom were reoperated. Definitive device explantation was necessary in seven patients. The cumulative probability of device explantation was 44 per cent at 48 months. The 15 patients with functioning implants were followed up for a mean of 26 (range 7-48) months. Continence grading improved from a mean of 18 (range 14-20) in the preoperative period to 4 (range 0-14) after operation (P < 0.001). Resting anal canal pressure in patients with a functioning implant increased from a mean of 35 (range 8-87) mmHg before operation to 54 (range 34-70) mmHg after implantation (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: An artificial anal sphincter is a useful alternative for refractory faecal incontinence but the incidence of late postoperative complications is high.
BACKGROUND: The postoperative complications and functional outcome following 24 consecutive implantations of an artificial anal sphincter were assessed prospectively. METHODS: A total of 24 artificial anal sphincters (Acticon Neosphincter) were implanted in 22 patients (mean age 47 years). The mean follow-up period was 28 (range 6-48) months. Results were assessed prospectively by two independent observers at 4-month intervals. The cumulative probability of artificial anal sphincter removal was analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Five patients were free of complications. During the postoperative period, complications occurred in nine patients, two of whom required reoperation. During follow-up, complications developed in ten patients, nine of whom were reoperated. Definitive device explantation was necessary in seven patients. The cumulative probability of device explantation was 44 per cent at 48 months. The 15 patients with functioning implants were followed up for a mean of 26 (range 7-48) months. Continence grading improved from a mean of 18 (range 14-20) in the preoperative period to 4 (range 0-14) after operation (P < 0.001). Resting anal canal pressure in patients with a functioning implant increased from a mean of 35 (range 8-87) mmHg before operation to 54 (range 34-70) mmHg after implantation (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: An artificial anal sphincter is a useful alternative for refractory faecal incontinence but the incidence of late postoperative complications is high.
Authors: Steven D Wexner; Tracy Hull; Yair Edden; John A Coller; Ghislain Devroede; Richard McCallum; Miranda Chan; Jennifer M Ayscue; Abbas S Shobeiri; David Margolin; Michael England; Howard Kaufman; William J Snape; Ece Mutlu; Heidi Chua; Paul Pettit; Deborah Nagle; Robert D Madoff; Darin R Lerew; Anders Mellgren Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2010-03-31 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Andreas M Kaiser; Guy R Orangio; Massarat Zutshi; Suraj Alva; Tracy L Hull; Peter W Marcello; David A Margolin; Janice F Rafferty; W Donald Buie; Steven D Wexner Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-03-08 Impact factor: 4.584