Literature DB >> 20354809

Infection rates in a large investigational trial of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence.

Steven D Wexner1, Tracy Hull, Yair Edden, John A Coller, Ghislain Devroede, Richard McCallum, Miranda Chan, Jennifer M Ayscue, Abbas S Shobeiri, David Margolin, Michael England, Howard Kaufman, William J Snape, Ece Mutlu, Heidi Chua, Paul Pettit, Deborah Nagle, Robert D Madoff, Darin R Lerew, Anders Mellgren.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Treatment options for patients with fecal incontinence (FI) are limited, and surgical treatments can be associated with high rates of infection and other complications. One treatment, sacral nerve stimulation (SNS), is approved for FI in Europe. A large multicenter trial was conducted in North America and Australia to assess the efficacy of SNS in patients with chronic fecal incontinence. The aim of this report was to analyze the infectious complication rates in that trial.
METHODS: Adult patients with a history of chronic fecal incontinence were enrolled into this study. Those patients who fulfilled study inclusion/exclusion criteria and demonstrated greater than two FI episodes per week underwent a 2-week test phase of SNS. Patients who showed a > or = 50% reduction in incontinent episodes and/or days per week underwent chronic stimulator implantation. Adverse events were reported to the sponsor by investigators at each study site and then coded. All events coded as implant site infection were included in this analysis.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty subjects (92% female, 60.5 +/- 12.5 years old) received a chronically implanted InterStim Therapy device (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Patients were followed for an average of 28 months (range 2.2-69.5). Thirteen of the 120 implanted subjects (10.8%) reported infection after the chronic system implant. One infection spontaneously resolved and five were successfully treated with antibiotics. Seven infections (5.8%) required surgical intervention, with infections in six patients requiring full permanent device explantation. The duration of the test stimulation implant procedure was similar between the infected group (74 min) and the non-infected group (74 min). The average duration of the chronic neurostimulator implant procedure was also similar between the infected (39 min) and non-infected group (37 min). Nine infections occurred within a month of chronic system implant and the remaining four infections occurred more than a year from implantation. While the majority (7/9) of the early infections was successfully treated with observation, antibiotics, or system replacement, all four of the late infections resulted in permanent system explantation.
CONCLUSION: SNS for FI resulted in a relatively low infection rate. This finding is especially important because the only other Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for end-stage FI, the artificial bowel sphincter, reports a much higher rate. Combined with its published high therapeutic success rate, this treatment has a positive risk/benefit profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20354809     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-010-1177-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  20 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic devices for fecal incontinence: dynamic graciloplasty, artificial bowel sphincter and sacral nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Yair Edden; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.166

2.  Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: long-term outcome.

Authors:  K E Matzel; P Lux; S Heuer; M Besendörfer; W Zhang
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 3.  Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  J M Jorge; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 4.  Advances in the surgical treatment of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Benjamin Person; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  Long-term results of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe anal incontinence.

Authors:  J Christiansen; O O Rasmussen; K Lindorff-Larsen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Characteristics of infections in patients undergoing staged implantation for sacral nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Michael L Guralnick; Saraleen Benouni; R Corey O'Connor; Charles Edmiston
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Artificial bowel sphincter in severe anal incontinence.

Authors:  E Casal; A San Ildefonso; R Carracedo; C Facal; J A Sánchez
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  Sacral nerve stimulation is more effective than optimal medical therapy for severe fecal incontinence: a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Joe J Tjandra; Miranda K Y Chan; Chung Hung Yeh; Carolyn Murray-Green
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  The safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence: results from a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  W Douglas Wong; Susan M Congliosi; Michael P Spencer; Marvin L Corman; Patrick Tan; Frank G Opelka; Marcus Burnstein; Juan J Nogueras; H Randolph Bailey; Jose Manuel Devesa; Robert D Fry; Burt Cagir; Elisa Birnbaum; James W Fleshman; Mallory A Lawrence; W Donald Buie; John Heine; Peter S Edelstein; Sharon Gregorcyk; Paul Antoine Lehur; Francis Michot; P Terry Phang; David J Schoetz; Fabio Potenti; Josephine Y Tsai
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a 120-patient prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Steven D Wexner; John A Coller; Ghislain Devroede; Tracy Hull; Richard McCallum; Miranda Chan; Jennifer M Ayscue; Abbas S Shobeiri; David Margolin; Michael England; Howard Kaufman; William J Snape; Ece Mutlu; Heidi Chua; Paul Pettit; Deborah Nagle; Robert D Madoff; Darin R Lerew; Anders Mellgren
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  14 in total

1.  Sacral nerve stimulation--hidden costs (uncovered).

Authors:  M Zeiton; Sara Faily; James Nicholson; Karen Telford; Abhiram Sharma
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Current management of fecal incontinence: choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Ann M Van Koughnett; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Sacral Neuromodulation Implant Infection: Risk Factors and Prevention.

Authors:  Calvin Lee; Javier Pizarro-Berdichevsky; Marisa M Clifton; Sandip P Vasavada
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Presacral abscess as a rare complication of sacral nerve stimulator implantation.

Authors:  A Gumber; S Ayyar; H Varia; S Pettit
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Fecal Incontinence: Epidemiology, Impact, and Treatment.

Authors:  Katarzyna Bochenska; Anne-Marie Boller
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

6.  Treatment of fecal incontinence: state of the science summary for the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases workshop.

Authors:  William E Whitehead; Satish S C Rao; Ann Lowry; Deborah Nagle; Madhulika Varma; Khalil N Bitar; Adil E Bharucha; Frank A Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Clinical Challenges of Fecal Incontinence in the Elderly.

Authors:  Hadie Razjouyan; Shanti Prasad; Sita Chokhavatia
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09

8.  Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence improves symptoms, quality of life and patients' satisfaction: results of a monocentric series of 119 patients.

Authors:  Henri Damon; Xavier Barth; Sabine Roman; François Mion
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence - the experience of a pelvic floor center : short term results.

Authors:  Roberto Paolo Iachetta; Alessandra Cola; Roberto Dino Villani
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-01

10.  Differences in sacral neuromodulation device infection rates based on preoperative antibiotic selection.

Authors:  Allen M Haraway; J Quentin Clemens; Chang He; Cynthia Stroup; Humphrey O Atiemo; Anne P Cameron
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.