Literature DB >> 27355772

Listening Effort in Younger and Older Adults: A Comparison of Auditory-Only and Auditory-Visual Presentations.

Mitchell S Sommers1, Damian Phelps.   

Abstract

One goal of the present study was to establish whether providing younger and older adults with visual speech information (both seeing and hearing a talker compared with listening alone) would reduce listening effort for understanding speech in noise. In addition, we used an individual differences approach to assess whether changes in listening effort were related to changes in visual enhancement-the improvement in speech understanding in going from an auditory-only (A-only) to an auditory-visual condition (AV) condition. To compare word recognition in A-only and AV modalities, younger and older adults identified words in both A-only and AV conditions in the presence of six-talker babble. Listening effort was assessed using a modified version of a serial recall task. Participants heard (A-only) or saw and heard (AV) a talker producing individual words without background noise. List presentation was stopped randomly and participants were then asked to repeat the last three words that were presented. Listening effort was assessed using recall performance in the two- and three-back positions. Younger, but not older, adults exhibited reduced listening effort as indexed by greater recall in the two- and three-back positions for the AV compared with the A-only presentations. For younger, but not older adults, changes in performance from the A-only to the AV condition were moderately correlated with visual enhancement. Results are discussed within a limited-resource model of both A-only and AV speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27355772      PMCID: PMC4942117          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  24 in total

1.  Measures of auditory-visual integration in nonsense syllables and sentences.

Authors:  K W Grant; P F Seitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise.

Authors:  Penny Anderson Gosselin; Jean-Pierre Gagné
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Perceived listening effort for a tonal task with contralateral competing signals.

Authors:  William J Bologna; Monita Chatterjee; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Aging, audiovisual integration, and the principle of inverse effectiveness.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Mitchell Sommers; Brent Spehar; Joel Myerson; Sandra Hale
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.

Authors:  Penny Anderson Gosselin; Jean-Pierre Gagné
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.

Authors:  Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer; Joost M Festen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Todd A Ricketts; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Auditory-visual speech perception and auditory-visual enhancement in normal-hearing younger and older adults.

Authors:  Mitchell S Sommers; Nancy Tye-Murray; Brent Spehar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Seeing the talker's face supports executive processing of speech in steady state noise.

Authors:  Sushmit Mishra; Thomas Lunner; Stefan Stenfelt; Jerker Rönnberg; Mary Rudner
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-26
View more
  9 in total

1.  Talking points: A modulating circle reduces listening effort without improving speech recognition.

Authors:  Julia F Strand; Violet A Brown; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

2.  Understanding Speech Amid the Jingle and Jangle: Recommendations for Improving Measurement Practices in Listening Effort Research.

Authors:  Julia F Strand; Lucia Ray; Naseem H Dillman-Hasso; Jed Villanueva; Violet A Brown
Journal:  Audit Percept Cogn       Date:  2021-03-23

3.  Recall of Speech is Impaired by Subsequent Masking Noise: A Replication of Experiment 2.

Authors:  Claire Guang; Emmett Lefkowitz; Naseem Dillman-Hasso; Violet A Brown; Julia F Strand
Journal:  Audit Percept Cogn       Date:  2021-03-15

Review 4.  Hearing and speech processing in midlife.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Aging and working memory modulate the ability to benefit from visible speech and iconic gestures during speech-in-noise comprehension.

Authors:  Louise Schubotz; Judith Holler; Linda Drijvers; Aslı Özyürek
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-07-05

6.  About Face: Seeing the Talker Improves Spoken Word Recognition but Increases Listening Effort.

Authors:  Violet A Brown; Julia F Strand
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2019-11-22

7.  A Clinical Paradigm for Listening Effort Assessment in Middle-Aged Listeners.

Authors:  Ricky Kaplan Neeman; Ilan Roziner; Chava Muchnik
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-17

8.  Speech Understanding in Modulated Noise and Speech Maskers as a Function of Cognitive Status in Older Adults.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 9.  Audiovisual Temporal Perception in Aging: The Role of Multisensory Integration and Age-Related Sensory Loss.

Authors:  Cassandra J Brooks; Yu Man Chan; Andrew J Anderson; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.