Literature DB >> 12068425

The long-term success of modular proximal fixation stems in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Hugh U Cameron1.   

Abstract

A prospective study was carried out on the use of a proximally modular, proximal ingrowth noncemented stem in hip revision surgery. There were 109 short stems and 211 long stems. The mean follow-up was 7 years (range, 2-12 years). No revisions were required in the short-stem group for aseptic loosening; 3 (1.4%) revisions were required in the long-stem group. Lucency was absent in 91.7% of short-stem cases, was low grade in 7.2%, and was high grade in 1.1%. In the long-stem group, lucency was absent in 72.9% of cases, was low grade in 24.5%, and was high grade in 2.6%. No measurable subsidence occurred in the short-stem group, and 5 mm of subsidence occurred early in 2 of the long-stem group. This subsidence stabilized subsequently. Osteolysis distal to the sleeve was not observed. A proximal ingrowth, proximally modular stem can be used in revision hip surgery. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12068425     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.32462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  14 in total

1.  Distal locking stem for revision femoral loosening and peri-prosthetic fractures.

Authors:  Patrice Mertl; Remy Philippot; Philippe Rosset; Henri Migaud; Jacques Tabutin; Denis Van de Velde
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a comparison of two stem designs.

Authors:  Corey J Richards; Clive P Duncan; Bassam A Masri; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Management bone loss of the proximal femur in revision hip arthroplasty: Update on reconstructive options.

Authors:  Vasileios I Sakellariou; George C Babis
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-11-18

4.  The Modular Universal Tumour And Revision System (MUTARS®) in endoprosthetic revision surgery.

Authors:  Carsten Gebert; Martin Wessling; Christian Götze; Georg Gosheger; Jendrik Hardes
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Mid-term Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular Cementless Femoral Stems.

Authors:  Hyung-Gyu Jang; Kyung-Jae Lee; Byung-Woo Min; Hee-Uk Ye; Kyung-Hwan Lim
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2015-09-30

6.  [Modular noncemented femoral stem system in revision total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  M D Schofer; T Efe; T J Heyse; N Timmesfeld; R Velte; F Hinrichs; J Schmitt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Revision total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated modular stem: 5 to 10 years follow-up.

Authors:  Dror Lakstein; David Backstein; Oleg Safir; Yona Kosashvili; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  In vivo severe corrosion and hydrogen embrittlement of retrieved modular body titanium alloy hip-implants.

Authors:  Danieli C Rodrigues; Robert M Urban; Joshua J Jacobs; Jeremy L Gilbert
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.368

9.  [Revision arthroplasty of the hip: modularity of neck and metaphyseal components].

Authors:  G Köster; T A Walde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 10.  [Revision hip arthroplastiy of the hip joint. Revision of the femur: which implant is indicated when?].

Authors:  A Gruner; K-D Heller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.