Literature DB >> 12062147

Structural constraints in the perception of English stop-sonorant clusters.

Elliott Moreton1.   

Abstract

Native-language phonemes combined in a non-native way can be misperceived so as to conform to native phonotactics, e.g. English listeners are biased to hear syllable-initial [tr] rather than the illegal [tl] (Perception and Psychophysics 34 (1983) 338; Perception and Psychophysics 60 (1998) 941). What sort of linguistic knowledge causes phonotactic perceptual bias? Two classes of models were compared: unit models, which attribute bias to the listener's differing experience of each cluster (such as their different frequencies), and structure models, which use abstract phonological generalizations (such as a ban on [coronal][coronal] sequences). Listeners (N=16 in each experiment) judged synthetic 6 x 6 arrays of stop-sonorant clusters in which both consonants were ambiguous. The effect of the stop judgment on the log odds ratio of the sonorant judgment was assessed separately for each stimulus token to provide a stimulus-independent measure of bias. Experiment 1 compared perceptual bias against the onsets [bw] and [dl], which violate different structural constraints but are both of zero frequency. Experiment 2 compared bias against [dl] in CCV and VCCV contexts, to investigate the interaction of syllabification with segmentism and to rule out a compensation-for-coarticulation account of Experiment 1. Results of both experiments favor the structure models (supported by NSF).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12062147     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00014-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  11 in total

1.  Dental-to-velar perceptual assimilation: a cross-linguistic study of the perception of dental stop+/l/ clusters.

Authors:  Pierre A Hallé; Catherine T Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A vowel is a vowel: generalizing newly learned phonotactic constraints to new contexts.

Authors:  Kyle E Chambers; Kristine H Onishi; Cynthia Fisher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Sensitivity to Phonological Universals: The Case of Stops and Fricatives.

Authors:  Katalin Tamási; Iris Berent
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-08

4.  Perceptual representations of phonotactically illegal syllables.

Authors:  Mara Breen; John Kingston; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Listeners' knowledge of phonological universals: Evidence from nasal clusters.

Authors:  Iris Berent; Tracy Lennertz; Paul Smolensky; Vered Vaknin
Journal:  Phonology       Date:  2009

6.  Representations for phonotactic learning in infancy.

Authors:  Kyle E Chambers; Kristine H Onishi; Cynthia Fisher
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2011-10-12

7.  Phonological universals in early childhood: Evidence from sonority restrictions.

Authors:  Iris Berent; Katherine Harder; Tracy Lennertz
Journal:  Lang Acquis       Date:  2011

8.  Naturalistic speech supports distributional learning across contexts.

Authors:  Kasia Hitczenko; Naomi H Feldman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 12.779

9.  Language universals and misidentification: a two-way street.

Authors:  Iris Berent; Tracy Lennertz; Evan Balaban
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.500

10.  Not All Procedural Learning Tasks Are Difficult for Adults With Developmental Language Disorder.

Authors:  LouAnn Gerken; Elena Plante; Lisa Goffman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.