UNLABELLED: Calibration, i.e. the transformation in real time of the signal I(t) generated by the glucose sensor at time t into an estimation of glucose concentration G(t), represents a key issue for the development of a continuous glucose monitoring system. OBJECTIVE: To compare two calibration procedures. In the one-point calibration, which assumes that I(o) is negligible, S is simply determined as the ratio I/G, and G(t) = I(t)/S. The two-point calibration consists in the determination of a sensor sensitivity S and of a background current I(o) by plotting two values of the sensor signal versus the concomitant blood glucose concentrations. The subsequent estimation of G(t) is given by G(t) = (I(t)-I(o))/S. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A glucose sensor was implanted in the abdominal subcutaneous tissue of nine type 1 diabetic patients during 3 (n = 2) and 7 days (n = 7). The one-point calibration was performed a posteriori either once per day before breakfast, or twice per day before breakfast and dinner, or three times per day before each meal. The two-point calibration was performed each morning during breakfast. RESULTS: The percentages of points present in zones A and B of the Clarke Error Grid were significantly higher when the system was calibrated using the one-point calibration. Use of two one-point calibrations per day before meals was virtually as accurate as three one-point calibrations. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of a simple method for calibrating a continuous glucose monitoring system.
UNLABELLED: Calibration, i.e. the transformation in real time of the signal I(t) generated by the glucose sensor at time t into an estimation of glucose concentration G(t), represents a key issue for the development of a continuous glucose monitoring system. OBJECTIVE: To compare two calibration procedures. In the one-point calibration, which assumes that I(o) is negligible, S is simply determined as the ratio I/G, and G(t) = I(t)/S. The two-point calibration consists in the determination of a sensor sensitivity S and of a background current I(o) by plotting two values of the sensor signal versus the concomitant blood glucose concentrations. The subsequent estimation of G(t) is given by G(t) = (I(t)-I(o))/S. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A glucose sensor was implanted in the abdominal subcutaneous tissue of nine type 1 diabeticpatients during 3 (n = 2) and 7 days (n = 7). The one-point calibration was performed a posteriori either once per day before breakfast, or twice per day before breakfast and dinner, or three times per day before each meal. The two-point calibration was performed each morning during breakfast. RESULTS: The percentages of points present in zones A and B of the Clarke Error Grid were significantly higher when the system was calibrated using the one-point calibration. Use of two one-point calibrations per day before meals was virtually as accurate as three one-point calibrations. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of a simple method for calibrating a continuous glucose monitoring system.
Authors: Joseph El Youssef; Jessica R Castle; Julia M Engle; Ryan G Massoud; W Kenneth Ward Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2010-09-30 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Bruce A Buckingham; Craig Kollman; Roy Beck; Andrea Kalajian; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Michael J Tansey; Larry A Fox; Darrell M Wilson; Stuart A Weinzimer; Katrina J Ruedy; William V Tamborlane Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Robert A Croce; SanthiSagar Vaddiraju; Jun Kondo; Yan Wang; Liang Zuo; Kai Zhu; Syed K Islam; Diane J Burgess; Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos; Faquir C Jain Journal: Biomed Microdevices Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 2.838