Literature DB >> 12052350

Calibration of a subcutaneous amperometric glucose sensor implanted for 7 days in diabetic patients. Part 2. Superiority of the one-point calibration method.

C Choleau1, J C Klein, G Reach, B Aussedat, V Demaria-Pesce, G S Wilson, R Gifford, W K Ward.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Calibration, i.e. the transformation in real time of the signal I(t) generated by the glucose sensor at time t into an estimation of glucose concentration G(t), represents a key issue for the development of a continuous glucose monitoring system.
OBJECTIVE: To compare two calibration procedures. In the one-point calibration, which assumes that I(o) is negligible, S is simply determined as the ratio I/G, and G(t) = I(t)/S. The two-point calibration consists in the determination of a sensor sensitivity S and of a background current I(o) by plotting two values of the sensor signal versus the concomitant blood glucose concentrations. The subsequent estimation of G(t) is given by G(t) = (I(t)-I(o))/S. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A glucose sensor was implanted in the abdominal subcutaneous tissue of nine type 1 diabetic patients during 3 (n = 2) and 7 days (n = 7). The one-point calibration was performed a posteriori either once per day before breakfast, or twice per day before breakfast and dinner, or three times per day before each meal. The two-point calibration was performed each morning during breakfast.
RESULTS: The percentages of points present in zones A and B of the Clarke Error Grid were significantly higher when the system was calibrated using the one-point calibration. Use of two one-point calibrations per day before meals was virtually as accurate as three one-point calibrations.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the feasibility of a simple method for calibrating a continuous glucose monitoring system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12052350     DOI: 10.1016/s0956-5663(01)00304-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron        ISSN: 0956-5663            Impact factor:   10.618


  25 in total

1.  Continuous glucose monitoring: real-time algorithms for calibration, filtering, and alarms.

Authors:  B Wayne Bequette
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-03-01

2.  Use of subcutaneous interstitial fluid glucose to estimate blood glucose: revisiting delay and sensor offset.

Authors:  Kerstin Rebrin; Norman F Sheppard; Garry M Steil
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01

3.  Continuous glucose monitoring in subjects with type 1 diabetes: improvement in accuracy by correcting for background current.

Authors:  Joseph El Youssef; Jessica R Castle; Julia M Engle; Ryan G Massoud; W Kenneth Ward
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Evaluation of factors affecting CGMS calibration.

Authors:  Bruce A Buckingham; Craig Kollman; Roy Beck; Andrea Kalajian; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Michael J Tansey; Larry A Fox; Darrell M Wilson; Stuart A Weinzimer; Katrina J Ruedy; William V Tamborlane
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Development of mediator-type biosensor to wirelessly monitor whole cholesterol concentration in fish.

Authors:  Mai Takase; Masataka Murata; Kyoko Hibi; Ren Huifeng; Hideaki Endo
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 2.794

6.  Professional continuous glucose monitoring in subjects with type 1 diabetes: retrospective hypoglycemia detection.

Authors:  Morten Hasselstrøm Jensen; Toke Folke Christensen; Lise Tarnow; Zeinab Mahmoudi; Mette Dencker Johansen; Ole Kristian Hejlesen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-01-01

7.  Preclinical Performance Evaluation of Percutaneous Glucose Biosensors: Experimental Considerations and Recommendations.

Authors:  Robert J Soto; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-17

8.  Factory-Calibrated Continuous Glucose Sensors: The Science Behind the Technology.

Authors:  Udo Hoss; Erwin Satrya Budiman
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  A miniaturized transcutaneous system for continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Robert A Croce; SanthiSagar Vaddiraju; Jun Kondo; Yan Wang; Liang Zuo; Kai Zhu; Syed K Islam; Diane J Burgess; Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos; Faquir C Jain
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.838

Review 10.  Biocompatible materials for continuous glucose monitoring devices.

Authors:  Scott P Nichols; Ahyeon Koh; Wesley L Storm; Jae Ho Shin; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.