Literature DB >> 12052099

Reporting heterogeneity in the measurement of health and health-related quality of life.

Amir Shmueli1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate heterogeneity (systematic and observable variation) in health or health-related quality-of-life reports across population groups, for a given level of 'true health'.
DESIGN: The investigators undertook full sit-down face-to-face interviews with 1999 individuals representing Jewish Israelis aged 45 to 75 years who resided in urban Israeli communities in 1993. Three popular measures of health and health-related quality of life were used: a categorical subjective evaluation, the 36-item Short Form health survey and a visual analogue health-related quality-of-life rating scale. The empirical analysis of the various relationships was based on the use of multiple-indicator linear structural equation models with latent variables. The model was estimated by the 2-stage least squares (2SLS) method.
RESULTS: In general, the results confirm the existence of substantial measure-specific heterogeneity in reporting (with differences associated with age, gender and education level) for all three measures.
CONCLUSIONS: The existence of heterogeneity in reporting renders the results of quality-of-life investigations sensitive to the sample used, and considerably limits the ability to generalise from these results and make comparisons with other populations. Economic evaluations based on self-reports are thus sensitive not only to the measure used, but also to the sample used. The application of results to populations differing in their socioeconomic and demographic structures, even if similar in the distribution of 'true health', might be misleading.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12052099     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200220060-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  12 in total

1.  Income-related health inequality in Canada.

Authors:  K H Humphries; E van Doorslaer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Subjective health status and health values in the general population.

Authors:  A Shmueli
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1999 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Adaptation and scale of reference bias in self-assessments of quality of life.

Authors:  W Groot
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Income-related inequalities in health: some international comparisons.

Authors:  E van Doorslaer; A Wagstaff; H Bleichrodt; S Calonge; U G Gerdtham; M Gerfin; J Geurts; L Gross; U Häkkinen; R E Leu; O O'Donnell; C Propper; F Puffer; M Rodríguez; G Sundberg; O Winkelhake
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Validation of the 36-item short-form Health Survey (Hebrew version) in the adult population of Israel.

Authors:  N Lewin-Epstein; T Sagiv-Schifter; E L Shabtai; A Shmueli
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Is self-rated health comparable across cultures and genders?

Authors:  M Jylhä; J M Guralnik; L Ferrucci; J Jokela; E Heikkinen
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 8.  Gender and health: an update on hypotheses and evidence.

Authors:  L M Verbrugge
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1985-09

9.  Subjective health measures and state dependent reporting errors.

Authors:  M Kerkhofs; M Lindeboom
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 10.  Adaptation and well-being.

Authors:  J Heyink
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1993-12
View more
  8 in total

1.  Anchoring vignettes for health comparisons: an analysis of response consistency.

Authors:  Nicole Au; Paula K Lorgelly
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Compulsive buying and quality of life: An estimate of the monetary cost of compulsive buying among adults in early midlife.

Authors:  Chenshu Zhang; Judith S Brook; Carl G Leukefeld; Mario De La Rosa; David W Brook
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.222

3.  SRH and HrQOL: does social position impact differently on their link with health status?

Authors:  Cyrille Delpierre; Michelle Kelly-Irving; Mette Munch-Petersen; Valérie Lauwers-Cances; Geetanjali D Datta; Benoît Lepage; Thierry Lang
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  An extended hierarchical ordered probit model robust to heteroskedastic vignette perceptions with an application to functional limitation assessment.

Authors:  Zhiyong Huang; Haoxian Wang; Wenyuan Zheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sick of social status: A Bourdieusian perspective on morbidity and health inequalities.

Authors:  Mirza Balaj; Terje A Eikemo
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2022-07-02

6.  Comparison of the information provided by electronic health records data and a population health survey to estimate prevalence of selected health conditions and multimorbidity.

Authors:  Concepción Violán; Quintí Foguet-Boreu; Eduardo Hermosilla-Pérez; Jose M Valderas; Bonaventura Bolíbar; Mireia Fàbregas-Escurriola; Pilar Brugulat-Guiteras; Miguel Ángel Muñoz-Pérez
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Health utilities of type 2 diabetes-related complications: a cross-sectional study in Sweden.

Authors:  Aliasghar A Kiadaliri; Ulf-G Gerdtham; Björn Eliasson; Soffia Gudbjörnsdottir; Ann-Marie Svensson; Katarina Steen Carlsson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Does reporting behaviour bias the measurement of social inequalities in self-rated health in Indonesia? An anchoring vignette analysis.

Authors:  Wulung Hanandita; Gindo Tampubolon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 4.147

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.