Literature DB >> 10658847

Income-related health inequality in Canada.

K H Humphries1, E van Doorslaer.   

Abstract

This study uses data from the 1994 National Population Health Survey and applies the methods developed by Wagstaff and van Doorslaer (1994, measuring inequalities in health in the presence of multiple-category morbidity indicators. Health Economics 3, 281-291) to measure the degree of income-related inequality in self-reported health in Canada by means of concentration indices. It finds that significant inequalities in self-reported ill-health exist and favour the higher income groups--the higher the level of income, the better the level of self-assessed health. The analysis also indicates that lower income individuals are somewhat more likely to report their self-assessed health as poor or less-than-good than higher income groups, at the same level of a more 'objective' health indictor such as the McMaster Health Utility Index. The degree of inequality in 'subjective' health is slightly higher than in 'objective' health, but not significantly different. The degree of inequality in self-assessed health in Canada was found to be significantly higher than that reported by van Doorslaer et al. (1997, income related inequalities in health: some international comparisons, Journal of Health Economics 16, 93-112) for seven European countries, but not significantly different from the health inequality measured for the UK or the US. It also appears as if Canada's health inequality is higher than what would be expected on the basis of its income inequality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10658847     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00319-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  31 in total

1.  Reporting heterogeneity in the measurement of health and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Amir Shmueli
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The health of Canadians on welfare.

Authors:  Nicholas T Vozoris; Valerie S Tarasuk
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

Review 3.  Vulnerable populations in rural areas: challenges for ethics committees.

Authors:  Victor Maddalena; Susan Sherwin
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2004-12

4.  Health-related quality of life and health utility for the institutional elderly in Taiwan.

Authors:  Kuan-Lang Lai; Rong-Jye Tzeng; Bing-Long Wang; Hong-Shen Lee; Roger L Amidon; Senyeong Kao
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  The complementarity and substitution between unconventional and mainstream medicine among racial and ethnic groups in the United States.

Authors:  K Tom Xu; Tommie W Farrell
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Do stressors explain the association between income and declines in self-rated health? A longitudinal analysis of the National Population Health Survey.

Authors:  Heather M Orpana; Louise Lemyre; Shona Kelly
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2007

7.  Long-term employment and health inequalities in Canadian communities.

Authors:  Jalil Safaei
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2008 May-Jun

8.  Anchoring vignettes for health comparisons: an analysis of response consistency.

Authors:  Nicole Au; Paula K Lorgelly
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Measuring health status: self-, interviewer, and physician reports of overall health.

Authors:  Kimberly V Smith; Noreen Goldman
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2010-11-01

10.  Exploring the relationship between socioeconomic status, control beliefs and exercise behavior: a multiple mediator model.

Authors:  Terra C Murray; Wendy M Rodgers; Shawn N Fraser
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.