Literature DB >> 9602839

Is self-rated health comparable across cultures and genders?

M Jylhä1, J M Guralnik, L Ferrucci, J Jokela, E Heikkinen.   

Abstract

Self-rated health is a frequently used health indicator, but there is little data on its comparability across cultures. We employed samples from Tampere, Finland, and Florence, Italy, of the European Longitudinal Study on Aging to examine the cultural and gender differences in self-rated health. Personal interview data was used and vital status ascertained after 7 years. After adjusting for several health-related variables, we found no substantial difference in self-rated health between genders, although women in Florence were three times and men in Florence four times more likely to report good self-rated health than men in Tampere. The correlational structure of self-rated health was similar in both areas. The significant graded association between self-rated health and mortality in both areas was mostly explained by other health indicators included in a multivariate model. Results suggest that self-rated health is a useful summary of physical health, but it may predict mortality better in men than in women and be sensitive to cultural environment. Therefore, direct gender and cultural comparisons of self-rated health should be made with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9602839     DOI: 10.1093/geronb/53b.3.s144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci        ISSN: 1079-5014            Impact factor:   4.077


  93 in total

1.  Reporting heterogeneity in the measurement of health and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Amir Shmueli
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Poorer self-perceived health among migrants and ethnic minorities versus the majority population in Europe: a systematic review.

Authors:  Signe Smith Nielsen; Allan Krasnik
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Day-to-day discrimination and health among Asian Indians: a population-based study of Gujarati men and women in Metropolitan Detroit.

Authors:  Mieko Yoshihama; Deborah Bybee; Juliane Blazevski
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-09-29

4.  Conceptualizing and measuring intergenerational ambivalence in later life.

Authors:  J Jill Suitor; Megan Gilligan; Karl Pillemer
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Self-rated health among foreign- and U.S.-born Asian Americans: a test of comparability.

Authors:  Elena Erosheva; Emily C Walton; David T Takeuchi
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Poor self-rated health associated with an increased risk of subsequent development of lung cancer.

Authors:  Hilde Kristin Refvik Riise; Trond Riise; Gerd Karin Natvig; Anne Kjersti Daltveit
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Are different measures of self-rated health comparable? An assessment in five European countries.

Authors:  Hendrik Jürges; Mauricio Avendano; Johan P Mackenbach
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Self-rated health as a predictor of mid-term and long-term mortality in older Afro-Caribbeans hospitalised via the emergency department.

Authors:  Lidvine Godaert; C Godard-Sebillotte; L Allard Saint-Albin; L Bousquet; I Bourdel-Marchasson; J-L Fanon; M Dramé
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Differentiating positive and negative self-rated health: results from a cross-sectional study in Estonia.

Authors:  Rainer Reile; Mall Leinsalu
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.380

10.  Determinants of self-rated health and the role of acculturation: implications for health inequalities.

Authors:  Irina L G Todorova; Katherine L Tucker; Marcia Pescador Jimenez; Alisa K Lincoln; Sandra Arevalo; Luis M Falcón
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.