Literature DB >> 12045147

Shannon information theoretic computation of synonymous codon usage biases in coding regions of human and mouse genomes.

Barry Zeeberg1.   

Abstract

Exonic GC of human mRNA reference sequences (RefSeqs), as well as A, C, G, and T in codon position 3 are linearly correlated with genomic GC. These observations utilize information from the completed human genome sequence and a large, high-quality set of human and mouse coding sequences, and are in accord with similar determinations published by others. A Shannon Information Theoretic measure of bias in synonymous codon usage was developed. When applied to either human or mouse RefSeqs, this measure is nonlinearly correlated with genomic, exonic, and third codon position A, C, G, and T. Information values between orthologous mouse and human RefSeqs are linearly correlated: mouse = 0.092 + 0.55 human. Mouse genes were consistently placed in genomic regions whose GC content was closer to 50% than was the GC content of the human ortholog. Since the (nonlinear) information versus percent GC curve has a minimum at 50% GC and monotonically increases with increasing distance from 50% GC, this phenomenon directly results in the low slope of 0.55. This appears to be a manifestation of an evolutionary strategy for placement of genes in regions of the genome with a GC content that relates synonymous codon bias and protein folding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12045147      PMCID: PMC1383734          DOI: 10.1101/gr.213402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  37 in total

1.  The relationship between synonymous codon usage and protein structure.

Authors:  T Xie; D Ding; X Tao; D Dafu
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1998-08-28       Impact factor: 4.124

2.  Codon usage tabulated from the international DNA sequence databases.

Authors:  Y Nakamura; T Gojobori; T Ikemura
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  What drives codon choices in human genes?

Authors:  S Karlin; J Mrázek
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-10-04       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 4.  DNA sequence evolution: the sounds of silence.

Authors:  P M Sharp; M Averof; A T Lloyd; G Matassi; J F Peden
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Codon usage and genome evolution.

Authors:  P M Sharp; G Matassi
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 6.  Codon usage: mutational bias, translational selection, or both?

Authors:  P M Sharp; M Stenico; J F Peden; A T Lloyd
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.407

7.  Codon usage and base composition in Rickettsia prowazekii.

Authors:  S G Andersson; P M Sharp
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Evolutionary parameters of the transcribed mammalian genome: an analysis of 2,820 orthologous rodent and human sequences.

Authors:  W Makalowski; M S Boguski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Codon usage in Caenorhabditis elegans: delineation of translational selection and mutational biases.

Authors:  M Stenico; A T Lloyd; P M Sharp
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-07-11       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The effects of mutation and natural selection on codon bias in the genes of Drosophila.

Authors:  R M Kliman; J Hey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  21 in total

1.  Large retrotransposon derivatives: abundant, conserved but nonautonomous retroelements of barley and related genomes.

Authors:  Ruslan Kalendar; Carlos M Vicient; Ofer Peleg; Kesara Anamthawat-Jonsson; Alexander Bolshoy; Alan H Schulman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Variation in the correlation of G + C composition with synonymous codon usage bias among bacteria.

Authors:  Haruo Suzuki; Rintaro Saito; Masaru Tomita
Journal:  EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol       Date:  2007

3.  Translational selection of genes coding for perfectly conserved proteins among three mosquito vectors.

Authors:  Olaf Rodriguez; Brajendra K Singh; David W Severson; Susanta K Behura
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.342

4.  Information theoretic perspective on genome clustering.

Authors:  Alaguraj Veluchamy; Preeti Mehta; K V Srividhya; Hirendra Vikram; M K Govind; Ramneek Gupta; Abdul Aziz Bin Dukhyil; Raed Abdullah Alharbi; Saleh Abdullah Aloyuni; Mohamed M Hassan; S Krishnaswamy
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  Sex moderates the effects of the Sorl1 gene rs2070045 polymorphism on cognitive impairment and disruption of the cingulum integrity in healthy elderly.

Authors:  Ying Liang; He Li; Chenlong Lv; Ni Shu; Kewei Chen; Xin Li; Junying Zhang; Liangping Hu; Zhanjun Zhang
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Variable strength of translational selection among 12 Drosophila species.

Authors:  Andreas Heger; Chris P Ponting
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Extreme dependence of gH and gL expression on ORF57 and association with highly unusual codon usage in rhesus monkey rhadinovirus.

Authors:  John P Bilello; Jennifer S Morgan; Ronald C Desrosiers
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Multiscale modeling of metabolism and macromolecular synthesis in E. coli and its application to the evolution of codon usage.

Authors:  Ines Thiele; Ronan M T Fleming; Richard Que; Aarash Bordbar; Dinh Diep; Bernhard O Palsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Applying Shannon's information theory to bacterial and phage genomes and metagenomes.

Authors:  Sajia Akhter; Barbara A Bailey; Peter Salamon; Ramy K Aziz; Robert A Edwards
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Mutation rate and predicted phenotypic target sizes in ethylnitrosourea-treated mice.

Authors:  Dorothy Concepcion; Kevin L Seburn; Gen Wen; Wayne N Frankel; Bruce A Hamilton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.