Literature DB >> 12044744

Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in amblyopic vision.

Dennis M Levi1, Srividhya Hariharan, Stanley A Klein.   

Abstract

Amblyopic vision is characterized by reduced spatial resolution, and inhibitory spatial interactions ("crowding") that extend over long distances. The present paper had three goals: (1) To ask whether the extensive crowding in amblyopic vision is a consequence of a shift in the spatial scale of analysis. To test this we measured the extent of crowding for targets that were limited in their spatial frequency content, over a large range of target sizes and spatial frequencies. (2) To ask whether crowding in amblyopic vision can be explained on the basis of contrast masking by remote flanks. To test this hypothesis we measured and compared crowding in a direction-identification experiment with masking by remote flanks in a detection experiment. In each of the experiments our targets and flanks were comprised of Gabor features, thus allowing us to control the feature contrast, spatial frequency and orientation. (3) To examine the relationship between the suppressive and facilitatory interactions in amblyopic contrast detection and "crowding". Our results show that unlike the normal fovea [Levi, Klein, & Hariharan, Journal of Vision 2 (2002a) 140] crowding in amblyopia is neither scale invariant, nor is it attributable to simple contrast masking. Rather, our results suggest that suppressive spatial interactions in amblyopic vision extend over larger distances than in normal foveal vision, similar to peripheral vision of non-amblyopic observers [Levi, Hariharan, & Klein, Journal of Vision 2 (2002b) 167], for targets of the same size. Observers can easily detect the features that comprise our targets (Gabor patches) under conditions where crowding is strong. Thus, our speculation is that crowding occurs because the target and flanks are combined or pooled at a second stage that is coarse in the amblyopic visual system, following the stage of feature extraction. In amblyopic vision, this pooling takes place over a large spatial distance.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12044744     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00061-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  36 in total

1.  Impaired visual decision-making in individuals with amblyopia.

Authors:  Faraz Farzin; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Improving vision in adult amblyopia by perceptual learning.

Authors:  Uri Polat; Tova Ma-Naim; Michael Belkin; Dov Sagi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Monocular activation of V1 and V2 in amblyopic adults measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ian P Conner; J Vernon Odom; Terry L Schwartz; Janine D Mendola
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  Global contour processing in amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; Cong Yu; Shu-Guang Kuai; Elizabeth Rislove
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Action-video-game experience alters the spatial resolution of vision.

Authors:  C S Green; D Bavelier
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-01

6.  Retinotopic maps and foveal suppression in the visual cortex of amblyopic adults.

Authors:  Ian P Conner; J Vernon Odom; Terry L Schwartz; Janine D Mendola
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Collinearity improves alignment in amblyopia as well as in normal vision.

Authors:  Ariella V Popple; Kevin Yuen; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Linking assumptions in amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.241

9.  Contour interaction under photopic and scotopic conditions.

Authors:  Lenka Musilová; František Pluhácek; Stephanie M Marten-Ellis; Harold E Bedell; John Siderov
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  How do flanking objects affect reaching and grasping behavior in participants with macular disorders?

Authors:  Shahina Pardhan; Carmen Gonzalez-Alvarez; Ahalya Subramanian; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.