Literature DB >> 19779816

Top quality embryos at day 2: a prerequisite for single blastocyst transfer? An observational cohort study in women under 36.

Fabrice Guerif1, Malak Lemseffer, Milène Blanchard, Dominique Royere.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: While extended culture has been considerably improved, some questions remain regarding the application of Single Blastocyst Transfer (SBT).
METHODS: An observational cohort study was undertaken with 456 women under 36 years old and assigned to SBT on a voluntary basis. The main outcome was the cumulative delivery rate per couple according to the number of Top Quality Embryos (TQE) on day 2 (Group 1= > or =2 TQE, Group 2= 1 TQE and Group 3= 0 TQE).
RESULTS: Rate of transfer and mean number of frozen blastocyts were higher in Group 1 compared to Group 3. As a consequence, the cumulative delivery rate per couple was higher in Group 1 (47.9%) compared to Group 3 (34.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: Single blastocyst transfer combining fresh and frozen cycles, might be a worthwhile strategy irrespective of embryo quality on day 2 providing good delivery rates while keeping the rate of multiple deliveries low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19779816      PMCID: PMC2767491          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-009-9345-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  32 in total

1.  Chromosome mosaicism in day 3 aneuploid embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts in vitro.

Authors:  M C Magli; G M Jones; L Gras; L Gianaroli; I Korman; A O Trounson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Comparison of blastocyst transfer with day 3 embryo transfer in similar patient populations.

Authors:  A A Milki; M D Hinckley; J D Fisch; D Dasig; B Behr
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Introduction of blastocyst culture and transfer for all patients in an in vitro fertilization program.

Authors:  D Marek; M Langley; D K Gardner; N Confer; K M Doody; K J Doody
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Blastocyst-stage transfer of poor-quality cleavage-stage embryos results in higher implantation rates.

Authors:  B Balaban; B Urman; C Alatas; R Mercan; S Aksoy; A Isiklar
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  The number of eight-cell embryos is a key determinant for selecting day 3 or day 5 transfer.

Authors:  C Racowsky; K V Jackson; N A Cekleniak; J H Fox; M D Hornstein; E S Ginsburg
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  The couple's decision-making in IVF: one or two embryos at transfer?

Authors:  M Blennborn; S Nilsson; C Hillervik; D Hellberg
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Day 3 morphology is a poor predictor of blastocyst quality in extended culture.

Authors:  J Graham; T Han; R Porter; M Levy; R Stillman; M J Tucker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer.

Authors:  D K Gardner; M Lane; J Stevens; T Schlenker; W B Schoolcraft
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Efficacy of blastocyst transfer after implantation failure.

Authors:  F Guerif; R Bidault; O Gasnier; M L Couet; O Gervereau; J Lansac; D Royere
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.828

10.  Day 5 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a controlled randomized trial.

Authors:  S Coskun; J Hollanders; S Al-Hassan; H Al-Sufyan; H Al-Mayman; K Jaroudi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Valuable Reference of Live Birth Rate in the Single Vitrified-Warmed BB/BC/CB Blastocyst Transfer: The Cleavage-Stage Embryo Quality and Embryo Development Speed.

Authors:  Xi Shen; Hui Long; Hongyuan Gao; Wenya Guo; Yating Xie; Di Chen; Yanyan Cong; Yun Wang; Dongying Li; Jiqiang Si; Leiwen Zhao; Qifeng Lyu; Yanping Kuang; Li Wang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.566

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.